The Analogy of Religion to the Constitution and Course of Nature: To which are added two brief dissertations: I. On personal identity. II. On the nature of virtue.Butler, Joseph
Religion
The Analogy of Religion to the Constitution and Course of Nature: To which are added two brief dissertations: I. On personal identity. II. On the nature of virtue.
Butler, Joseph
Analogy (Religion); Apologetics -- Early works to 1800; Eschatology; Natural theology; Revelation
=4.= Thus analogy sanctions an arrangement, by which the ruinous
consequences of vice or folly may be averted, at least in some
cases.
=5.= If the consequences of rash and inconsiderate acts, which
we scarcely call vicious, are often so serious, we may apprehend
that the bad consequences will be greater, in proportion as the
irregularity is greater.
=6.= A dissolute disregard to all religion, if there be a
religion, is incomparably more reprehensible than the mere
neglects, imprudencies, &c. of this life.
=7.= As the effects of worldly imprudence and vice are often
misery, ruin, and even death, no one can say what may be
the consequences of blasphemy, contempt of God, and final
impenitence.
=8.= Nor can any one tell, how far the consequences of such great
wickedness can possibly be prevented, consistently with the
eternal rule of right.
=9.= Still there would, from analogy, be some hope of room for
pardon.
IV. _There is no probability that any thing we could do alone, would
entirely prevent the effects of our irregularities._
=1.= We do not know all the reasons for punishment, nor why it
should be fit to remit punishment.
=2.= Nor do we know all the consequences of vice, and so should
not know how to prevent them.
=3.= Vice impairs men’s abilities for helping themselves.
=4.= Misconduct makes assistance necessary, which otherwise would
not have been. Why should not the same things be so, as to our
future interests?
=5.= In temporal things, behaving well in time to come, does not
repair old errors, why should it as to future things?
=6.= Were it so in _all cases_ it would be contrary to all our
notions of government.
=7.= It could not be determined in what degree, or in what cases,
it would be so, even if we knew it might in _some_ cases.
=8.= The efficacy of repentance, as urged in opposition to
atonement, is contrary to the general sense of mankind; as shown
by the prevalence of propitiatory sacrifices.
V. _In this state of apprehension, awakened by the light of nature,
revelation comes in, and teaches positively, the possibility of pardon
and safety._
=1.= Confirms our fears as to the unprevented consequences of sin.
=2.= Declares the world to be in a state of ruin.
=3.= That repentance alone will not secure pardon.
=4.= That there is a mode of pardon, by interposition.
=5.= That God’s moral government is compassionate, as well as his
natural government.
=6.= That he has provided, by the interposition of a mediator, to
save men.
=7.= All this seems to put man in a strange state of helpless
degradation. But it is not Christianity which puts him so. All
philosophy and history show man to be degraded and corrupt.
VI. _Scripture, in addition to confirming the dim testimony of the
light of nature, reveals a Christ, as mediator and propitiatory
sacrifice._
=1.= He is “_that prophet_.”
1.) Declared the will of God.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account