The further development of our geometry, so as to include surfaces,
volumes, and four-dimensional regions, obviously presents no difficulty
in principle, and I do not propose to enlarge upon it. I will merely
observe that it is possible to extend the method by which we have
defined points and lines so as to obtain something which we may call
surfaces and regions, though not quite in the usual sense. Probably
various ways of doing this are possible; the one that I suggest is the
following.
A class of lines will be called "co-superficial" when any two
intersect, but there is no point common to all the lines of the class.
A "surface" is a co-superficial class of lines which cannot be
augmented without ceasing to be co-superficial.
A class of surfaces is "co-regional" when any two have a line in
common, but no line is common to all the surfaces of the class.
A "region" is a co-regional class of surfaces which cannot be augmented
without ceasing to be co-regional.
It is obvious that this method could be extended to any number of
dimensions; also that it requires limitations and extensions. But it
seems unnecessary to pursue the matter further, since it is plain that
we have what is needed for the pre-co-ordinate geometry of space-time.
Let us now compare our constructed space-time with the spatial
manifolds of analysis situs. In the preceding chapter[Pg 312] we quoted
Hausdorff's definition of a "topological" space, and we saw that, in
order to prove the usual propositions about limits, it is necessary
that the total number of neighbourhoods should be . Let
us now define as a "neighbourhood" of a point any set of points
each of which contains as a sub-class a certain finite co-punctual
class of events which is a sub-class of . That is to say, if a is
a co-punctual class of events each of which is a member of , the
set of all the points of which a is a sub-class will be a neighbourhood
of . With this definition of a "neighbourhood," it is obvious that
our space has the four characteristics by which Hausdorff (loc.
cit., p. 213) defines a topological space. In order to insure that
our space shall also satisfy his second denumerative axiom (loc.
cit., p. 263), it is necessary and sufficient to assume that the
total number of events is . With this assumption, the
theorems of analysis situs become applicable to our space-time
manifold of points.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account