It remains to say a word on the subject of dimensions. We have not
so far said anything explicit on this subject, though our original
introduction of co-punctuality as a five-term relation could only
prove satisfactory in a four-dimensional manifold. The most suitable
definition of dimensions from our point of view is that of Poincaré,
which is inductive. He defines a space as one-dimensional if,
given any two points , , there is an isolated set of points
such that no connected part of -not- contains both
and . And he defines a space as -dimensional if,
given any two points , , there is an ()-dimensional
set of points such that no connected part of -not-
contains both and . Using this definition, or any other
which is purely topological, we set up the axiom that our topological
space-time is to be four-dimensional.[67] This completes the material
required for the topological treatment of space-time.
FOOTNOTES:
[66]
For a geometry based on "neighbourhood," see Hausdorff,
Grundzüge der Mengenlehre (Leipzig, 1914), chaps, VII.
and VIII.
[67]
For an account of the modern theory of dimensions, see
Karl Menger, Bericht über die Dimensionstheorie, Jahresbericht
der deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 35, pp. 113-150 (1926).
[Pg 313]
CHAPTER XXX
CAUSAL LINES
THE notion of causality has been greatly modified by the substitution
of space-time for space and time. We may define causality in its
broadest sense as embracing all laws which connect events at different
times, or, to adapt our phraseology to modern needs, events the
intervals between which are time-like. Now owing to the fact that
the formula for is formally the same for time-like and for
space-like intervals, there is no longer the difference that formerly
existed between causal and geometrical relations. Geodesics are
geometrical, but they are also the paths of material particles. It is
hardly correct to say that a particle moves in a geodesic; it
is more correct to say that a particle is a geodesic (though not all
geodesics are particles). To say that a particle moves in a geodesic is
to use language appropriate to the conception of a space which persists
through time, involving the notion of a position which may be occupied
either at one time or at another. We think, for example, that it is
possible to move from to or from to ; but such a
view is incompatible with the theory of space-time. According to that
theory, every position of a body has a date, and it is impossible to
occupy the same position at another date, since the date is one of the
co-ordinates of the position. When we travel from to , the
date is continually advancing; the return journey, having different
dates, does not cover the same route. Thus geometry and causation
become inextricably intertwined.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account