This is not zero unless ; thus in general events which
are simultaneous for one observer are not simultaneous for the other.
We cannot therefore regard space and time as independent, as has
always been done in the past. Even the order of events in time is not
definite: in one system of co-ordinates an event A may precede an event
B, while in another B may precede A. This, however, is only possible
if the events are so separated that, no matter how we choose our
co-ordinates, light starting from either could not reach the place of
the other until after the other had occurred.
The Lorentz transformation yields the result that:
Since and , we have:
or, putting , for the distances of the event from the two
observers:
This result is general—i.e. given any two reference-bodies in
uniform relative motion, if is the distance between two events
according to one system, the distance according to the other,
and if , are the corresponding time-intervals between the
events, equation (2) will always hold. Thus
represents a physical quantity, independent of
the choice of co-ordinates; it is called the square of the "interval"
between the two events. There are two cases, according as it is
positive or negative. When it is positive, the interval between the
events is called "time-like"; when negative, "space-like." In the
intermediate case in which it is zero, the events are such that one
light-ray can be present at each. In this case, one event might be the
seeing of the other. The time-order of two events[Pg 52] will be different in
different reference-systems when their interval is space-like, but when
it is time-like the time-order is the same in all systems, though the
magnitude of the time-interval varies.
When the interval between two events is time-like, it is possible
for a body to move in such a way as to be present at both events.
In that case, the interval is what clocks on that body will show as
the time. When the interval between two events is space-like, it is
possible for a body to move in such a way that, by its clocks, the two
events will be simultaneous; in that case, the interval is what, in
relation to that body, appears as their distance. (In these remarks,
we are taking the velocity of light as the unit of velocity, which is
convenient in relativity theory.) Both these are consequences of the
Lorentz transformation. From the first of them it follows that, if two
events both happen to me, the time between them as measured by my watch
(assuming it to be a good watch) is the "interval" between them, and
has still a physical significance. Thus the time that is concerned in
psychology is unaffected by relativity, assuming that everything that
psychology is concerned with happens, from a physical point of view, in
the body of the person whose mental events are being considered. This
is an assumption for which grounds will be given at a later stage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account