The points of space-time have, of course, no duration as well as no
spatial extension. It is generally assumed that several events may
occupy the same point; this is involved in the conception of the
intersection of world-lines. I think it may also be assumed that
one event may extend over a finite extent of space-time, but on
this point the theory is silent, so far as I know. I shall myself,
in a later chapter, deal with the construction of points as systems
of events, each of which events has a finite extension; this is a
subject which has been especially treated by Dr Whitehead, but I
shall suggest a method somewhat different from his. So long as we
confine ourselves to the theory of relativity, it is not necessary to
consider whether events have a finite extension, though I think it is
necessary to assume that two events may both occupy the same point of
space-time. Even on this, however, there is a certain vagueness in the
authoritative expositions, which is due mainly to the large scale of
the phenomena with which the theory is principally concerned. Sometimes
it would seem as if the whole earth counted as a point; certainly one
physical laboratory does so in the practice of writers on relativity.
On occasion, Professor Eddington considers an area of square kilometres to be an infinitesimal of the second order.
The fact that such a view is appropriate in discussions of relativity
makes it unnecessary to be precise as to what is meant by saying that
two events occupy the same point, or that two world-lines intersect.
For the present I shall assume that this is possible in a strict sense;
my reasons will be given in a later chapter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account