The Ancestry of Modern Amphibia: A Review of the Evidence — John Shaqi
The Ancestry of Modern Amphibia: A Review of the EvidenceEaton, Theodore H. (Theodore Hildreth)
Science
The Ancestry of Modern Amphibia: A Review of the Evidence
Eaton, Theodore H. (Theodore Hildreth)
Amphibians -- Anatomy; Amphibians, Fossil
May it not be that closure of the gill-chamber by the opercular (=gular)
fold, retardation of limb development, expansion of the lips, growth of
parallel rows of horny teeth, and other correlated features that make a
tadpole, were brought about as an adaptation of the primitive Anuran
larva to a swift-stream habitat, and that this "basic patent" then later
served to admit the tadpoles of descendant types to an alga-scraping
habit in quiet water as well? The tadpole, as a unique larval type among
vertebrates, bears the hallmarks of an abrupt adaptive shift, such as
might have occurred within the limits of a single family, and it seems
difficult to imagine the enclosed branchial chamber, the tooth-rows, and
lips of a familiar tadpole as having evolved without some kind of
suctorial function along the way.
SUMMARY
The Anura probably originated among temnospondylous labyrinthodonts,
through a line represented approximately by _Eugyrinus_, _Amphibamus_,
and the Triassic frog _Protobatrachus_, as shown by Watson, Piveteau and
others. The known Paleozoic lepospondyls do not show clear indications
of a relationship with Urodela, but _Lysorophus_ may well be on the
ancestral stem of the Apoda.
Between Urodela and Anura there are numerous resemblances which seem to
indicate direct relationship through a common stock: (1) a similar
reduction of dermal bones of the skull and expansion of palatal
vacuities; (2) movable basipterygoid articulation in primitive members
of both orders; (3) an operculum formed in the otic capsule, with
opercularis muscle; (4) many details of cranial development, cranial
muscles, and thigh muscles, especially between _Ascaphus_ and the
Urodela, as shown by Pusey and Noble; (5) essentially similar manner of
vertebral development, quite consistent with derivation of both orders
from Temnospondyli; (6) presence in the larva of _Leiopelma_ of a
salamander-like gular fold, four limbs, and no suggestion of
modification from a tadpole (Stephenson).
LITERATURE CITED
Broom, R.
1918. Observations on the genus _Lysorophus_ Cope. Ann. Mag. Nat.
Hist., (9)2:232-239.
Bystrow, A. P.
1938. Dvinosaurus als neotenische Form der Stegocephalen. Acta
Zool., 19:209-295.
Case, E. C.
1935. Description of a collection of associated skeletons of
_Trimerorhachis_. Contrib. Mus. Pal. Univ. Michigan, 4:227-274.
Cope, E. D.
1889. The Batrachia of North America. Bull. U. S. Nat. Mus.,
34:1-525.
de Beer, G. R.
1937. The development of the vertebrate skull. Pp. xxiii + 552.
Oxford, Clarendon Press.
de Villiers, C. G. S.
1934. Studies of the cranial anatomy of _Ascaphus truei_
Stejneger, the American "Liopelmid." Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool.,
77:1-38.
Emelianov, S. W.
1936. Die Morphologie der Tetrapodenrippen. Zool. Jahrb. (Anat.),
62:173-274.
Francis, E. T. B.
1934. The anatomy of the salamander. Pp. xxxi + 381. Oxford,
Clarendon Press.
Gamble, D. L.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account