It is obvious, however, that although sections of this kind suffice to prove the dykes to belong to distinct periods of intrusion, no longer interval need have elapsed between their successive production than was required for the solidification and assumption of a joint-structure by an older dyke before a younger broke through it. They may both belong to one brief period of volcanic activity. But when we pass to a series of dykes traversing a considerable district of country, and find that those which run in one direction are invariably cut by those which run in another, the inference can hardly be resisted that they do not belong to the same period of eruption, but mark successive epochs of volcanic energy. An excellent example of this kind of evidence is furnished by Mr. Clough from Eastern Argyleshire. The east and west dykes in that district are undoubtedly older than those which run in a N.N.W. direction (Fig. 257).[206] The latter are by far the most abundant, and are on the whole much narrower, less persistent, and finer in grain. On the opposite coast of the Clyde, a similar double set of dykes may be traced through Renfrewshire, those in an east and west direction being comparatively few, while the younger N.N.W. series is well developed. The great sheets or "sills" connected with one of the Stirlingshire dykes, already described, appear to me to furnish similar evidence in the younger dykes which run through them. And this evidence is peculiarly valuable, for it shows a succession even among adjacent dykes which all run in the same general direction. [Footnote 206: As already stated, Mr. Clough and also Mr. Gunn are inclined to separate these older east and west dykes from the Tertiary series and to regard them as probably of late Palæozoic age.]