The Annual Report on the Health of the Parish of St. Mary Abbotts, Kensington, during the year 1874 — John Shaqi
The Annual Report on the Health of the Parish of St. Mary Abbotts, Kensington, during the year 1874Dudfield, T. Orme (Thomas Orme)
Science
The Annual Report on the Health of the Parish of St. Mary Abbotts, Kensington, during the year 1874
Dudfield, T. Orme (Thomas Orme)
Public health -- England -- London
5. It should be well drained, with stone ware pipes, and the drains
should be permanently trapped.
6. It should have attached to it ample and separate lairage,
constructed with a due regard to sanitary and other requirements.
7. It should be effectually separated from any lair, stable, dung-pit,
w.c., &c., so that the meat may not be exposed to any offensive
effluvia.
8. It should be of adequate size, and should not be used for any other
purpose than that for which it is licensed, and particularly it should
not be used as a stable, a lair, or a cow-shed.
Upon viewing the several slaughter-houses by this standard, so many were
found defective in one or other respect that it was thought best to give
the formal notice of opposition required by the Act, in every case, but
your Clerk and myself were directed to oppose the renewal of the license
in those cases only that did not come up to the standard. We did this,
but the justices overruled our objection in every case, on the ground
that the premises, however faulty, had been licensed in former years, and
time must be allowed to put them in proper order. At the same time, the
justices gave the assembled licensees notice that at the next licensing
day (in October of the current year, namely) they would not renew the
license in any case that was not up to the standard. With reference to
the decision of the magistrates, and the ground on which it was based, it
is, perhaps, hardly necessary for me to state the fact, so well known
already, that the existing slaughter-houses, were, without exception,
licensed before I entered upon the duties of my appointment, and that the
reason your Vestry did not oppose the renewal of the licenses in either
of the subsequent years was that, in common with myself, you believed
that the private slaughter-houses would be finally closed in 1874, under
the operation of the Building Act, 1844. It only remains to add that the
slaughter-houses will now have to be judged by the standard of the
bye-laws; and it may therefore be useful to state in what respect the
bye-laws differ—either in excess or defect—from the standard adopted by
your Vestry in 1874. As regards new slaughter-houses, the requirements
of the “local authority” are fully up to that standard; and, as regards
existing slaughter-houses, the only material differences between the
bye-laws and the standard relate to the points dealt with in clauses 1
and 6 (_supra_). The bye-laws do _not_ require that a slaughter-house
shall have an independent entrance, or be at all removed from other
buildings; and they do _not_ require provision to be made for housing
cattle previous to slaughtering; but it is enacted that no animal shall
be detained on the “premises” for a longer time than “absolutely
necessary” previous to slaughtering, and that the “slaughter-house”
(which is only a part of the “premises”) shall not be used for “any other
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account