The Apologia and Florida of Apuleius of MadauraApuleius
Philosophy
The Apologia and Florida of Apuleius of Madaura
Apuleius
Apuleius -- Translations into English; Speeches, addresses, etc., Latin -- Translations into English
CHAPTER 4. _not merely in Latin but also in Greek._ Cp. Florida,
chaps. 18 and 26.
_Tannonius Pudens_, an advocatus of the accusers and, presumably, a
relative.
_Homer_, sc. Il. iii. 65.
_Pythagoras_, inventor of the term [Greek: philosophia]; cp. Diog.
Laert. i, proem. 12. He was a native of Samos and migrated to Croton.
See Florida, chap. 15. Floruit circa 530 B.C.
_Zeno_ of Velia or Elea in Lucania was the founder of dialectic.
Floruit circa 450 B.C.
_self inconsistency._ The phrase _argumenta ambifariam dissolvere_ is
very obscure. I am indebted to Professor Cook Wilson for the following
note. 'A comparison of the passage with the captious argument of
Protagoras (Florida, chap. 17, _ambifariam proposuit_), which is in
the form of a dilemma, might suggest that _ambifariam_ in both places
means "by dilemma". But this is not a natural way of describing the
method of Zeno. The characteristic of his philosophy was, according to
tradition, that he tried to prove the thesis of Parmenides negatively
by disproving the hypothesis contradictory to it. The disproof
consisted in showing that the hypothesis in question involved a
contradiction. If, therefore, _ambifariam_ means "by dilemma" it would
appear that Apuleius did not understand the true characteristic of
Zeno's method; for _dissolvere_ should refer to Zeno's method of
disproof, which is not properly called dilemma.
'But perhaps it is not necessary to assume such a mistake on the part
of Apuleius. _Ambifariam_ may mean "ambiguously" in the sense of
involving both sides of a contradiction (i.e. both of two
contradictory propositions). This would suit the Protagoras passage
well, for the argument, as the context shows, involves a
contradiction. Zeno's argumentation also could be correctly described
as _ambifariam dissolvere_, because he refuted the thesis opposed to
that of Parmenides by showing that it involves a contradiction. Then
the meaning of the passage would be that Zeno's cleverness
(_sollertissimum artificium_) lay in the use of the _reductio ad
absurdum_ argument. In that case the translation would be as given in
the text.' I find a confirmation of Professor Cook Wilson's view in
the following line, cited from Timon of Phlius by Diog. Laert. ix. v.
2, where the word [Greek: amphoteroglossos] is used with reference to
Zeno's methods of argument, sc. [Greek: amphoteroglossou te mega
sthenos ouk alapadnon].
_Plato_, sc. Parmenides, 127_b_.
_capital charge._ There is an untranslatable pun here, _capitalis_
bearing the double meaning 'capital' and 'pertaining to the head'.
CHAPTER 5. _Statius Caecilius_, one of the most famous writers of
comedy. He died 168 B.C.
CHAPTER 6. _tooth-powder_, clearly a magical compound according to the
accusers.
_Catullus_, sc. xxxix. 17-21.
CHAPTER 7. _the barrier of the teeth._ Homer, Odyss. i. 64.
CHAPTER 8. _the crocodile._ See Herodotus ii. 68.
CHAPTER 9. _Teian_, sc. Anacreon, circa 520 B.C.
_Lacedaemonian_, sc. Alcman, circa 650 B.C.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account