The Apology of the Augsburg ConfessionMelanchthon, Philipp
Religion
The Apology of the Augsburg Confession
Melanchthon, Philipp
Lutheran Church -- Catechisms
In the Fifteenth Article they receive the first part, in which we say
that such ecclesiastical rites are to be observed as can be observed
without sin, and are of profit in the Church for tranquility and good
order. They altogether condemn the second part, in which we say that
human traditions instituted to appease God, to merit grace, and make
satisfactions for sins are contrary to the Gospel. Although in the
Confession itself, when treating of the distinction of meats, we have
spoken at sufficient length concerning traditions, yet certain things
should be briefly recounted here.
Although we supposed that the adversaries would defend human
traditions on other grounds, yet we did not think that this would
come to pass, namely, that they would condemn this article: that we
do not merit the remission of sins or grace by the observance of
human traditions. Since, therefore, this article has been condemned,
we have an easy and plain case. The adversaries are now openly
Judaizing, are openly suppressing the Gospel by the doctrines of
demons. For Scripture calls traditions doctrines of demons when it
is taught that religious rites are serviceable to merit the remission
of sins and grace. For they are then obscuring the Gospel, the
benefit of Christ, and the righteousness of faith. [For they are
just as directly contrary to Christ and to the Gospel as are fire and
water to one another.] The Gospel teaches that by faith we receive
freely, for Christ's sake, the remission of sins and are reconciled.
The adversaries, on the other hand, appoint another mediator, namely
these traditions. On account of these they wish to acquire remission
of sins; on account of these they wish to appease God's wrath. But
Christ clearly says, Matt. 15, 9: In vain do they worship Me,
teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account