The Apology of the Augsburg ConfessionMelanchthon, Philipp
Religion
The Apology of the Augsburg Confession
Melanchthon, Philipp
Lutheran Church -- Catechisms
But although the adversaries now moderate their praises concerning
perfection, yet they actually think otherwise. For they sell merits,
and apply them on behalf of others under the pretext that they are
observing precepts and counsels, hence they actually hold that they
have superfluous merits. But what is it to arrogate to one's self
perfection, if this is not? Again, it has been laid down in the
_Confutation_ that the monks endeavor to live more nearly in
accordance with the Gospel. Therefore it ascribes perfection to
human traditions if they are living more nearly in accordance with
the Gospel by not having property, being unmarried, and obeying the
rule in clothing, meats, and like trifles.
Again, the _Confutation_ says that the monks merit eternal life the
more abundantly, and quotes Scripture, Matt. 19, 29: Every one that
hath forsaken houses, etc. Accordingly, here, too, it claims
perfection also for factitious religious rites. But this passage of
Scripture in no way favors monastic life. For Christ does not mean
that to forsake parents, wife, brethren, is a work that must be done
because it merits the remission of sins and eternal life. Yea, such
a forsaking is cursed. For if any one forsakes parents or wife in
order by this very work to merit the remission of sins or eternal
life, this is done with dishonor to Christ.
There is, moreover, a twofold forsaking. One occurs without a call,
without God's command; this Christ does not approve, Matt. 15, 9. For
the works chosen by us are useless services. But that Christ does
not approve this flight appears the more clearly from the fact that
He speaks of forsaking wife and children. We know, however, that
God's commandment forbids the forsaking of wife and children. The
forsaking which occurs by God's command is of a different kind,
namely, when power or tyranny compels us either to depart or to deny
the Gospel. Here we have the command that we should rather bear
injury, that we should rather suffer not only wealth, wife, and
children, but even life, to be taken from us. This forsaking Christ
approves, and accordingly He adds: For the Gospel's sake, Mark 10, 29,
in order to signify that He is speaking not of those who do injury
to wife and children, but who bear injury on account of the
confession of the Gospel. For the Gospel's sake we ought even to
forsake our body. Here it would be ridiculous to hold that it would
be a service to God to kill one's self, and without God's command to
leave the body. So, too, it is ridiculous to hold that it is a service
to God without God's command to forsake possessions, friends, wife,
children.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account