{1.28} Ibid. xxiv. 34; I. Cor. xv. 5; the conclusion of Mark in the
manuscript L. The fragment of the Gospel of the Hebrews in St.
Ignatius, _Epist. ad Smyrn._, and in St. Jerome, _de Viris
Ill._, 16, seem to place "the vision of Peter" in the evening,
and to confound it with that of the assembled Apostles. But
St. Paul expressly distinguishes between the two visions.
{1.29} Luke xxiv. 23, 24. It results from these passages that the
tidings were separately proclaimed.
{1.30} Mark xvi. 1-8; Matthew xxviii. 9, 10, contradict this. But
this is at variance with the synoptical system, where the
women only see an angel. It seems that the first Gospel was
intended to reconcile the synoptical system with that of the
fourth, wherein one woman only saw Jesus.
{1.31} Matt, xxxviii. 2, et seq.; Mark xvi. 5, et seq.; Luke xxiv.
4, et seq., 23. This apparition of angels is even introduced
into the story of the fourth Gospel (xx. 12, 13), which it
completely deranges, being applied to Mary of Magdala. The
author was unwilling to abandon this traditionary feature.
{1.32} Mark xvi. 8.
{1.33} Luke xxiv. 4, 7; John xx. 12, 13.
{1.34} Matt. xviii. 1, et seq. The story of Matthew is that in which
the circumstances have suffered the greatest exaggeration. The
earthquake and the feature of the guards are probably late
additions.
{1.35} The six or seven accounts which we have of this scene on
Sunday morning (Mark having two or three, and Paul having also
his own, to say nothing of the Gospel of the Hebrews), are in
complete disagreement with each other.
{1.36} Matt. xxvi. 31; Mark xiv. 27; John xvi. 32; Justin, _Apol._
i. 50; _Dial. cum Tryph._, 53, 106. The theory of Justin is
that immediately on the death of Jesus, there was a complete
apostasy on the part of His disciples.
{1.37} Matt. xxviii. 17; Mark xvi. 11; Luke xxiv. 11.
{1.38} Mark xvi. 9; Luke viii. 2.
{1.39} Consult, for example, Calmeil, _De la Folie au Point de Vue
Pathologique, Historique et Judiciaire_. Paris, 1845. 2 vols,
in 8vo.
{1.40} See the _Pastoral Letters_ of Jurieu, 1st year, 7th letter;
Misson, _The Sacred Theatre of Cevennes_ (London, 1707), pp.
28, 34, 38, 102, 103, 104, 107; Memoirs of Court in Sayons,
_History of French Literature_, seventeenth century, i. p.
303. _Bulletin of the French Protestant Historical Society_,
1862, p. 174.
{1.41} Matt. xiv. 26; Mark vi. 49; Luke xxiv. 37; John iv. 19.
{1.42} Mark xvi. 12-13; Luke xxiv. 13-33.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account