The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus: Translated into English with Introduction and Notes — John Shaqi
The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus: Translated into English with Introduction and NotesHippolytus, Antipope
Religion
The Apostolic Tradition of Hippolytus: Translated into English with Introduction and Notes
Hippolytus, Antipope
Canon law -- Early church, ca. 30-600; Church orders, Ancient
This Callistus had had in earlier years a career that was at least
ambiguous. The servant of a wealthy Christian, he was permitted by his
master to undertake in Rome the experiment of a “Christian bank”, in
which many of the faithful deposited their savings. As has usually
been the case with such experiments, the bank failed, and in this case
no assets could be discovered. Callistus fled, but was brought back to
Rome and sentenced to the treadmill. After a while he was released and
sought to regain favour with the Christians by interrupting a Jewish
synagogue service and preaching Christianity to the congregation.[41]
For this he was sent to the Sardinian convict mines. All of this
appears to have taken place during the ninth decade of the second
century; in any case Callistus was still a prisoner when Bishop Victor
succeeded in obtaining from the Emperor Commodus the release of many
Christian prisoners in the year 190 or thereabouts.[42] The list of
names drawn up by Victor and sent to Sardinia did not include
Callistus, but he contrived to secure his discharge as well, and he
returned to Italy as at least technically a “martyr”.[43] Victor,
however, did not permit him to remain in Rome and dismissed him to
Antium, where he lived until Victor’s death, receiving from the
church’s fund a monthly allowance that enabled him to avoid suffering.
Victor was succeeded by Zephyrinus, an easy-going man of small
intelligence, who in past years had conceived an intense admiration
for Callistus. He immediately recalled the latter to Rome, ordained
him presbyter,[44] and made him his chief lieutenant; during
Zephyrinus’s episcopacy Callistus was the real power at Rome. His only
significant rival was Hippolytus.
Two more different men can scarcely be imagined. Both were equally
determined to have their own way. But Callistus was suave and
ingratiating, little concerned with theological speculation, desirous
of immediate practical results and none too scrupulous as to ways and
means, indifferent to precedents and perfectly willing to try novel
experiments. Hippolytus was dour and irascible,[45] convinced that
meticulous theology must be maintained though the heavens fell,
scandalized at the mere thought of relaxing discipline, a
traditionalist to his finger tips, who believed that any new idea was
necessarily Satanic. Between such antagonists a relentless war was
inevitable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account