The Appendages, Anatomy, and Relationships of TrilobitesRaymond, Percy E. (Percy Edward)
Science
The Appendages, Anatomy, and Relationships of Trilobites
Raymond, Percy E. (Percy Edward)
Trilobites
The earliest crustacean-annelids possessed large labra or prostomia
projecting backward, still retained in the Apodidæ and trilobites.
This labrum almost necessitated a very deliberate manner of
browsing. The animal would creep along, and would have to run some
way over its food before it could get it into its mouth, the whole
process, it seems to us, necessitating a number of small movements
backwards and forwards. Small living prey would very often escape,
owing to the fact that the animal's mouth and jaws were not ready
in position for them when first perceived. The labrum necessitates
the animal passing forwards over its prey, then darting backward to
follow it with its jaws. We here see how useful the gnathobases of
_Apus_ must be in catching and holding prey which had been thus
passed over. Indeed the whole arrangement of the limbs of _Apus_
with the sensory endites forms an excellent trap to catch prey
over which the labrum has passed.
In alcoholic specimens of _Apus_ the labrum is not in a horizontal
plane, as it is in most well preserved trilobites, but is tipped down
at an angle of from 30 to 45, and the big mandibles lie under it. It
has considerable freedom of motion and is held in place by muscles
which run forward and join the under side of the head near its
posterior margin. It seems entirely possible that the hypostoma of
the trilobite had as much mobility as the labrum of _Apus_, and that
byopening downward it brought the mouth lower and nearer the food. It
will be recalled that the hypostomata of practically all trilobites
are pointed at the posterior margin, there being either a central
point or a pair of prongs. By dropping down the hypostoma until
the point or prongs rested on or in the substratum, and sending food
forward to the mouth by means of the appendages, a trilobite could
make of itself a most excellent trap, and if the animal could dart
backward as well as forward, the hypostoma would be still more useful.
There is no reason to suppose that they could not move backward, and
the "pygidial antennæ" of _Neolenus_ indicate that animals of that genus
at least did so. This habit of dropping down the hypostoma would also
permit the use of those anterior gnathobases which seem too far ahead
of the mouth in the trilobites with a long hypostoma.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account