The Appendages, Anatomy, and Relationships of TrilobitesRaymond, Percy E. (Percy Edward)
Science
The Appendages, Anatomy, and Relationships of Trilobites
Raymond, Percy E. (Percy Edward)
Trilobites
The cause of the incomplete development of the glabellar lobes
lies, hence, in the intrusion of the alimentary canal, and it makes
naturally the most effect where the gizzard spreads out and bends
into the stomach. This spot lies behind the frontal lobe, which is
hence increased in size according as the stomach increases in size;
in this way not only the foremost segments of the glabella become
enlarged, but also the following ones more or less pressed aside.
This process is easily followed phylogenetically and
ontogenetically.
From the latter point of view, the development of _Paradoxides_ is
very instructive. In a head shield 2.5 mm. long the whole anterior
part of the glabella is broadened, but the five pairs of lateral
impressions are clearly marked and the six segments of the head
bounded by them are all of about the same size. In a head shield
about 13 mm. long, the foremost segment is very much increased in
size, the jaw lobes pressed still further apart; in adult forms
both anterior segments are combined into the frontal swellings
of the glabella. In other groups this process proceeds
phylogenetically still further, so that among the Phacopidæ and in
_Trinucleus_, behind the frontal swelling of the glabella only the
last cephalic segment retains a certain independence. The frontal
lobe is thus no definite part, although it is as a rule composed of
the mesotergites of the first two cranidial segments.
This idea of an enlarged mesenteron certainly has much to commend it,
and such actual evidence as exists seems in favor of rather than
against it. The strongest, firmest, best-protected place in the whole
body of the trilobite is the cavity between the vaulted glabella and
the hypostoma. As Jaekel has said, it is far too large a cavity for
the brain, larger than would seem to be required for a heart, and what
else could be there but a stomach? As has already been pointed out,
Beyrich and Barrande found a pear-shaped enlargement of the alimentary
canal under the glabella of _Cryptolithus_. Longitudinal sections
through the glabella of _Calymene_ and _Ceraurus_ practically always
show the cavity there filled with clear crystalline calcite. One
actual specimen of _Ceraurus_ (Walcott 1881, pl. 4, fig. 1) shows the
cavity between the glabella and hypostoma entirely empty. The vacant
spaces in these two classes of specimens do not, however, necessarily
mean anything more than imperfect preservation.
[Illustration: Fig. 21.--Transverse slice through _Ceraurus
pleurexanthemus_, to show the dorsal sheath above the abdominal
cavity. Specimen 118. Traced from a photographic enlargement. × 4.]
[Illustration: Fig. 22.--Transverse section through the cephalon of
_Ceraurus pleurexanthemus_, showing the abdominal sheath and the large
mud-filled alimentary canal (clear white). Traced from a photographic
enlargement. Specimen 97. × 3.3.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account