The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the Colosseum — John Shaqi
The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the ColosseumParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the Colosseum
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
It is well known that the general form of the Colosseum is oval, and
that it had four principal entrances, one of which only remains; this
is said to have been the entrance for the emperor and his suite, it is
not numbered as the other entrances and seats were[101]. The theatre,
as we are told in the Regionary Catalogues, was calculated to hold
87,000 people, and was admirably adapted for its purpose. There were
four principal staircases, by which the spectators could ascend to the
highest tier of seats, and these were so arranged that the different
orders could disperse without meeting each other. The numerous places of
egress, called _vomitoria_, and the windows to light the staircases, were
contrived with great skill.
Vast as this amazing edifice still is, the whole of the outer wall
with the arcades and corridors, on the south and west sides, have been
destroyed, having been used as a stone quarry for building some of the
largest palaces in Rome, but on the north and east sides it is tolerably
perfect. A correct idea of the whole can only be formed by mounting to
the top, and surveying the whole extent from thence. The finest view of
the exterior is from the Thermæ of Titus, or the windows or the garden
of the monastery of S. Pietro in Vincoli, on the hill opposite the north
front.
The great mass of the building under the corridors is of tufa, and was
probably taken from that part of the second wall of Rome which passed
under the south end of the Palatine close at hand; each block of tufa,
being of large size and a ton in weight, was likely to be brought from
the nearest point. It has been mentioned that there are piers of
travertine at short intervals, as if the builders were afraid to trust
the soft tufa to carry so great a weight[102]. These piers go right
through the walls from top to bottom, to carry the weight of the upper
gallery when full of people; tufa is too soft a material to be trusted
for this purpose, and the brick facing did not add materially to the
strength. It is faced with cut stone (travertine) on the exterior, and
with brick on the interior. The work, as said before, was evidently
carried on for a long time. Three periods may be perceived[103] in the
stonework, with apparently an interval of some years between them. The
upper storey is of a later date, of the time of Alexander Severus and
Gordianus, and was evidently completed in great haste, of materials
previously prepared, (as may be distinctly seen in the interior); this
upper wall is built also in the most slovenly manner, with portions of
cornices and of columns, or fragments of old tombs, built into it as mere
pieces of stone[104]. On the interior of this wall large corbels remain
distinctly visible, which could only be for the floor of the wooden
gallery.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account