The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the ColosseumParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 7 : $b The Flavian amphitheatre, commonly called the Colosseum
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
[66] Taciti Ann., lib. xv. c. 42.
[67] Ibid., lib. xiv. c. 15.
[68] See p. 5.
[69] Santi-Bartoli (in a paper printed in the _Miscellanea_, by Fea, vol.
i. p. ccxxiii.) states that in his time a quantity of leaden water-pipes,
which carried water from the Thermæ of Titus to the Colosseum, were found
in an orchard north of the Colosseum.
[70] Suetonii Nero, c. 12.
[71] This dedication is referred to by Eutropius thus,—
“Hic [Titus] amphitheatrum Romæ ædificavit, et in dedicatione ejus
quinque millia ferarum occidit.” (Eutropius, lib. vii. c. 14. See also
Cassiodorus, Variar. l. v. op. 42. Opera omnia, ed. 1679, fol. vol. i. p.
94, c. 2.)
The account by Suetonius, writing some eighty or ninety years previously,
is very clear:—
“Amphitheatro dedicato, thermisque juxta celeriter exstructis, munus
edidit apparatissimum largissimumque. Dedit et navale prœlium in veteri
naumachia: ibidem et gladiatores: atque uno die quinque millia omne genus
ferarum.” (Suetonius Titus, c. 7.)
These old _naumachia_ were the same as the _stagnum navale_, the old
place for such amusements on the spot. They have been supposed to be the
Naumachia of Augustus in the Trastevere, but without authority; and the
mention of the gladiators in connection with them implies that it was at
the same place.
[72] See Photos., Nos. 3268, 3269, and the drawing of this restored in
Plates VII. and XV.
[73] See p. 37, and Plate X.
[74] Photos., Nos. 1761, 1762.
[75] Photos., No. 3279, and Plates II. and XX.
[76] It is important to notice this, because some able architects did
not see it at first sight, and imagined that these brick arches rested
upon the stone piers, which was evidently not really the case, though it
appears to be so.
M. Viollet-le-Duc, one of the most eminent architects of our time, says
that an experienced architect would cut through old tufa walls of this
kind as easily, and with as little scruple, as he would cut through
cheese, and the brick facing made no material difference.
[77] “... item stagnum maris instar, circumseptum ædificiis ad urbium
speciem.” (Suetonii Nero, c. 31.)
[78] Photos., Nos. 3282, 3285.
[79] See Plate XXI.
[80] See Plate XXII.
[81] See Plate XV.
[82] Photos., No. 3268, 3269.
[83] Photos., Nos. 3203, 3205, 3282, 3283. In some parts a brick wall of
the fifth or sixth century has been introduced between the two old tufa
walls, during the repairs after the earthquakes. This is at first sight
rather puzzling, until it is examined and properly considered.
[84] Photos., No. 3271.
[85] Photos., Nos. 3285, 3286.
[86] For elephants there are four larger dens provided, two on either
side of the central passage. See the Plan.
[87] Photos., No. 3282.
[88] See Plates XVI., XVII.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account