The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueducts — John Shaqi
The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueductsParker, John Henry
History
The archæology of Rome, Part 8 : $b The aqueducts
Parker, John Henry
Rome -- Antiquities
First, it should be remarked, that the water of the Appia was augmented
by an additional stream. This was not accomplished till the time of
Augustus. The source of this latter[23] was on the same side of the Via
Prænestina, but a little nearer to Rome (near the sixth milestone) we are
told, and its course was, like the main stream, entirely underground. It
was more direct, as its length was less than six miles and a-half, while
the original stream, by its windings, required about eleven miles to
complete the same distance[24].
It joined, however, the Appia _at the “Spes (Specus) Vetus,”_ and at the
Gemelli[25], which was _under (infra) the “Old Specus,”_ it could be
measured. This is an important landmark; it is well at once to observe
that the usual interpretation of the passage as referring to a “Temple
of Spes,” and the statement that a temple occupied the site of some
ruins which are marked thus in a few maps, (in most, _Templum Veneris et
Cupidinis_) does not seem to fit the circumstances. It is proposed to
read in both these two instances “Specus Vetus.” The expression occurs,
altogether, five times in Frontinus, and it will be most satisfactory
therefore to consider the passages together, which will be done more
conveniently in connection with the next aqueduct described.
The Torquatian and Plautian, or Pallantian gardens, seem by the context
to have occupied a spot on either side of the point of junction of the
two streams. The Torquatian gardens are not mentioned elsewhere, and
with respect to the Plautian[26] (which is only conjectural, and has the
authority of neither of the early MSS.), it has been suggested to read
_Pallantian_, which gardens are mentioned twice elsewhere by Frontinus in
connection with the Specus Vetus, besides once in such a way as to imply
the same[27].
The Torquatian gardens probably occupied the space between the outer
wall and the modern “Via di Porta Maggiore,” and were probably those
of Titus Manlius Torquatus, a member of an important patrician family;
Livy mentions at least three generations of that name. This ground
shews numerous remains of aqueducts and reservoirs, and here also is
the fine building of the third century called the Minerva Medica,
which was probably the _nymphæum_ of some _thermæ_ of that period[28].
The Pallantian gardens is a natural name for those belonging to the
Sessorium, or the Sessorian fortified Camp and Palace[29], and occupied
the low ground near it. They would therefore be to the south of, but
adjoining to, the Torquatian gardens.
II. THE ANIO VETUS (B.C. 272).
“Forty years after the Appian aqueduct had been completed, and
in the year A.U.C. 481 (B.C. 272), Marcus Curius Dentatus,
who bore the office of censor with Lucius Papirius Cursor,
contracted to bring into the city the water of the Anio,
which is now called the Anio Vetus, from the spoils taken of
Pyrrhus[30].
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account