[46] Heuzey, in the _Revue d’Assyriologie_, 1905, pp. 59 _sqq._ and
plate iii. Von Lichtenberg (_Mitteilungen der Vorderasiatischen
Gesellschaft_, 1906, 2) has lately pointed out that the black incised
pottery with white fillings is identical in Cyprus, Troy, the Laibach
bog and the Mondsee, and that the ornamentation which characterizes
it is found in the valley of the Danube and the pile-dwellings of
Switzerland. His attempt to derive it from Cyprus, however, cannot be
sustained in view of its occurrence in Elam.
[47] _Proceedings of the Society of Biblical Archæology_, 1905, p. 28.
[48] _Ilios_, p. 337. Schliemann called it the Third city. Dörpfeld’s
subsequent excavations, however, have shown that it really was the
Second city, whose history fell into three periods.
[49] Some of these represent the goddess with the arms folded, and not
pressed against the breasts. See, for example, the photograph of one
found at Naxos in the _Comptes rendus du Congrès international d’
Archéologie_, 1905, p. 221. For Trojan examples, see _Ilios_,
pp. 331–6.
[50] See _Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse_, viii. pp. 336–7. A
report of some of the results of the Pumpelly expedition is given by
Dr. Hubert Schmidt in the _Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 1906_, Pt.
iii, p. 385.
[51] Flint implements, however, were discovered by Taylor in his
excavations at Abu Shahrein, the site of Eridu (_Journal of the Royal
Asiatic Society_, xv. p. 410 and plate ii.).
[52] See Taylor’s “Notes on the Ruins of Muqeyer,” in the _Journal of
the Royal Asiatic Society_, xv. pp. 271–3 and 415.
[53] _Nippur_, vol. ii. pp. 381–6.
[54] _The Babylonian Expedition of the University of Pennsylvania_, i.
2, pp. 26–7.
[55] _Transactions of the Society of Biblical Archæology_, 1876,
pp. 347–8.
[56] Figured in the _Quarterly Statement of the Palestine Exploration
Fund_, October 1904, p. 335.
[57] Layard, _Nineveh and Babylon_, pp. 571–3.
[58] ANA-BAR. _Bar_ is given as the Sumerian pronunciation of the
word for “stone” (_Syllabary_ 5, iv. 11, in Delitzsch’s _Assyrische
Lesestücke_, 3rd edition). In Old Egyptian “iron” was similarly
_ba-n-pet_, “stone of heaven,” while “silver” was “white gold,” “gold”
being symbolized by a collar. We may compare the Indo-European “white”
metal as a name of “silver.” The Sumerian _azag-gi_, “gold,” was a form
of _azagga_, “precious,” more especially “precious metal”; the more
specific word for “gold” was _guskin_, with which the Armenian _oski_
must be connected. “Silver” was _bábara_, the “bright” metal, _nagga_
being “lead,” the Armenian _anag_. The identity of the Armenian and
Sumerian words for “gold” and “lead,” coupled with the Armenian origin
of the vine, and the fact that the mountain on which the ark of the
Babylonian Noah rested was Jebel Judi, south of Lake Van, raises an
interesting question as to the origin of Sumerian civilization.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account