[93] In Egyptian, however, the bird stands over a door, while in
Babylonian it is over the two-legged stool on which two vases of
offerings are set when it is used to denote the image of a god.
The Sumerian pictograph for “(divine) lord” or “lady” (NIN) is the
representation of a similar vase on a mat, and thus has the same form
as the Egyptian _hotep_. The Egyptian _nefer_, “good,” finds its exact
counterpart in the Babylonian pictograph of “ornament” (ME-TE). The
Babylonian “house,” too, is given the same tower-like shape as the
Egyptian (_āhā_).
[94] In a short Paper entitled _Lexicalische Belege zu meinen Vortrag
über die sprachliche Stellung des Altægyptischen_ (1895), in which
he has attempted to draw up a list of phonetic equivalences between
Egyptian and Sumerian. In this, however, I am unable to follow him, as
his comparisons of Egyptian and Sumerian words are not convincing.
[95] See de Morgan, _Recherches sur les Origines de l’Egypte_, pp.
94, 95. According to Schweinfurth, barley, which is also found in the
prehistoric graves of Egypt, must originally have come from Babylonia
like the wheat. _Qemḥu_ is found in the Pyramid texts (Maspero,
_Recueil de Travaux relatifs à la Philologie et à l’Archéologie
égyptiennes et assyriennes_, v. p. 10). _Boti_, whence the Coptic
_bôti_ and the _battawa_ or “durra cake” of modern Egyptian Arabic, was
“durra,” not “wheat.”
[96] See Maspero, _Études de Mythologie_, ii. pp. 313 _sqq._
[97] I have put “Lower” between parentheses since it is very
questionable whether this particular system of registering time was
known in the Delta until it was introduced from Upper Egypt. On the
Palermo stone a list of the early kings of Lower Egypt is given, but
without any dates, which make their appearance along with the kings of
the First dynasty, who belonged to Upper Egypt. It is interesting to
observe that the ideograph for “year” is denoted in exactly the same
way in both the Babylonian and the Egyptian hieroglyphs by the branch
of a (palm) tree. Such a curious symbol for the idea can hardly have
been invented independently. Professor Hommel further draws attention
to the fact that while the literal translation of a common ideographic
mode of representing “year” in Babylonian is “name of heaven,” that of
the two syllables of the Egyptian word _renpet_, “year,” would
also be “name of heaven.”
[98] _Hierakonpolis_, part i. plate xxix. The name of the king is
usually (but erroneously) written Nar-Mer.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account