Grotefend’s next task was to ascertain the old Persian pronunciation of
the name of Darius. This had been given by Strabo, while the Persian
pronunciation of Xerxes was indicated in the Old Testament. With this
assistance Grotefend was able to assign alphabetic values to the
cuneiform characters which composed the two names, and a corner of the
veil which had so long covered the cuneiform records was lifted at
last. A comparison of the names which he had thus read gave the needful
verification of the correctness of his method. In the names of Darius
and Xerxes the same letters occur, but in different places; _a_ and _r_
in _Darius_ occupy the second and third places, in _Xerxes_ the fourth
and fifth, while _sh_, which is the last letter in _Darius_, would
be the second and sixth in _Xerxes_. And such was actually the case.
Grotefend was therefore justified in concluding that his guesses were
correct, and that the right values had been assigned to the cuneiform
characters. A beginning had been made in cuneiform decipherment, and in
this instance the beginning was half the whole.
Grotefend’s Memoir was presented to the Göttingen Academy on September
4, 1802. By a curious accident it was at the same meeting that Heyne
described the first attempts that had been made towards deciphering
the Egyptian hieroglyphs. But the learned world looked askance at the
discoveries of the young Latinist. The science of archæology was still
unborn, and Oriental philologists were unable even to understand the
inductive method of the decipherer. The Academy of Göttingen refused to
print his communications, and it was not until 1815 that they appeared
in the first volume of the History of his friend Heeren, who, being
untrammelled by the prejudices of Oriental learning, had been one of
the earliest to accept his conclusions.[4] For a whole generation the
work of decipherment was allowed to sleep.
It is unfortunately true that after his initial success Grotefend’s
ignorance of Oriental languages really did stand in his way. He
assumed that the language of the inscriptions and that of the
_Zend-Avesta_ were one and the same, and accordingly went to the
newly-found Zend dictionary for the readings of the cuneiform names
and words. Vishtaspa, the name of the father of Darius, was thus
read Goshtasp, the word for “king” became _khsheh_ instead of
_khshayathiya_, and that which Grotefend had correctly divined
to signify “great,” _eghre_ instead of _vazraka_. It is not
wonderful, therefore, that he was never able to follow up the beginning
he had made.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account