The above quotations will show about the status of the professional opinion as expounded by the authors of the then works on dentistry. Most of these were written by practitioners who claimed special skill, and were in a measure separated from each other and the profession. With the exception of Hudson, Maynard and, possibly, one or two others, the practice of removing the pulps and filling the canals was not known or attempted. Harris, in 1840, speaks of their operations, but had attempted it only in a few cases, and with indifferent success. The necessity for, at least, claiming to succeed in operations of this kind—saving pulps—was almost imperative. In 1850, Dr. J. D. White, in the _News Letter_, says: "The treatment of the exposed pulp has given rise to great difference of sentiment among well educated dentists, but mainly about the means which should be employed for that purpose, agreeing pretty generally that it is bad practice to destroy it entirely. But as well might we expect to procure a healthy function of the reto-mucosum when denuded of the epidermis by substituting one of our own invention, as to procure a healthy function of the pulp when deprived of its natural protection, the bone." From about this time until within a comparative recent date, in all methods of capping the ultimate design has been to secure a production of secondary dentine at the exposed point of the pulp. The methods and materials made use of are almost numberless, and the successes claimed are also equally as numerous. For applications in the treatment we have recommended to us in our text-books, pure nitric acid, pure carbolic acid, pure creosote, iodoform, dilute chloride of zinc, iodine, bichloride of mercury, and in fact everything from stimulating it with the electric cautery, to feeding it upon lacto-phosphate of lime and powdered dentine. For capping: the different cements, stoppings, gums, minerals, etc.; and the cases run from the capping of the remaining third of the pulp in the root of a lower incisor upon which a pivot tooth was to be placed, an exposure in the distal surface of a third upper molar, and this suppurating, to a simple exposure from excavating a cavity for filling. Our dental societies in their reports show that some are very successful in their endeavors to save exposed pulps: that others don't kill babies for the sake of having a funeral, and attempt to save everything: while others, whose experiences are just as extensive, whose observations and opinions are just as much to be respected, claim that an exposed pulp that has ached or been inflamed, can never become healthy by any treatment whatsoever.