The Arena, Volume 18, No. 93, August, 1897 — John Shaqi
The Arena, Volume 18, No. 93, August, 1897Various
Philosophy
The Arena, Volume 18, No. 93, August, 1897
Various
American literature -- Periodicals
Produced by Barbara Tozier, Bill Tozier, Richard J. Shiffer
and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at
http://www.pgdp.net
[Transcriber's Note: Every effort has been made to replicate this text
as faithfully as possible, including obsolete and variant spellings and
other inconsistencies. Text that has been changed to correct an obvious
error is noted at the end of this ebook.
Also, mismatched single and double quotes remain as they were in the
original.]
THE ARENA.
VOL. XVIII.
AUGUST, 1897.
NO. 93.
[Illustration: David Starr Jordan (with signature)]
EVOLUTION: WHAT IT IS AND WHAT IT IS NOT.[1]
BY DR. DAVID STARR JORDAN,
_President of Leland Stanford Junior University_.
[1] Address before the Starr King Fraternity of Oakland, Cal.
I. WHAT EVOLUTION IS.
This the age of evolution. The word is used by many men in many senses,
and still oftener perhaps in no sense at all. By some it is spoken with
a haunting dread as though it were another name for the downfall of
religion and of social stability. Still others speak it glibly and
joyously as though progress and freedom were secured by the mere use of
the name. "The word evolution (_Entwickelung_)," says a German writer,
"fills the vocal chords more perfectly than any other word." It explains
everything, and "puts the key to the universe into one's vest pocket."
So various has been the use of the word, so rarely is this use
associated with any definite idea, that one hesitates to call himself an
evolutionist. "Evolution" and "evolutionist" are almost ready to be cast
into that "limbo of spoiled phraseology" which Matthew Arnold has found
necessary for so many words in which other generations have delighted,
and which they have soiled or spoiled by careless usage.
But as the word evolution is not yet put away, as it is the bugbear of
many good people, and the "religion" of as many more equally good, it
may be worth while to consider what it still means, and what it does not
mean. For if we that use the word can agree on a definition, half our
quarrel is over.
It seems to me that the word evolution is now legitimately used in four
different senses. It is the name of a branch of science. It is a theory
of organic existence. It is a method of investigation, and it is the
basis of a system of philosophy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account