The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question — John Shaqi
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern QuestionGreene, Frederick Davis
History
The Armenian Crisis in Turkey: The Massacre of 1894, Its Antecedents and Significance, With a Consideration of Some of the Factors Which Enter Into the Solution of This Phase of the Eastern Question
Greene, Frederick Davis
Armenian massacres, 1894-1896; Armenian question
The very well informed correspondent of _The Speaker_ wrote from
Constantinople two months ago: “I fear there can be no doubt about the
essential facts. We have already the official reports of the consuls at
Van, Erzroom, Sivas, and Diarbekir, which have not yet been published,
but which, we know, confirm the most horrible statements made in the
newspapers. We have the reports of the Armenian refugees who were
eye-witnesses. We have the reports sent to the Armenian Patriarchate
here, and the reports of Catholic and Protestant missionaries in the
vicinity of Sasun. Beyond this, and most horrible of all, we have the
testimony of the Turkish soldiers who took part in the massacres. These
soldiers ... have talked with the greatest freedom in public places, and
to all who would listen, boasting of their deeds. We have full reports
from all these places of the statements made by hundreds of these
soldiers, and they agree in all essential points.”[2]
The author does not ignore the repeated and earnest efforts that have
been made for years, by such individual Englishmen as the Hon. James
Bryce, to call attention to the condition of Armenia. Their protests
have kept alive Armenian hope that England at least would not entirely
repudiate her obligations. But the futility of these same protests has
also given assurance to the Sublime Porte in carrying out its policy of
repression and extermination in Armenia.
Of course neither the party in power, nor its successors, will proceed
energetically unless assured of the support of the people whom they
represent. As soon as there is sufficient pressure from behind something
more will be done than to dally with Turkish Commissions of Inquiry,
sent under circumstances which make a true and full report simply a
physical and moral impossibility.[3] The Turk is on trial and should be
allowed to plead “Not Guilty.” But it is not customary, in courts where
justice is the object, to allow the criminal at the bar the privilege of
acting also as the prosecuting attorney, and of summoning and examining
the witnesses. As is well known, the most stringent measures have been
taken by the Sublime Porte to prevent any representative of the press
from watching the proceedings of the Commission of Inquiry at Moosh, or
from making any independent investigation on the ground. Such
precautions are hardly necessary, for all evidence of the massacre was
concealed by torch and spade six months ago. If the executioners
themselves overlooked any of their victims, the jackals, dogs, and
vultures have surely found them by this time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account