The art of music. Vol. 01 (of 14) : $b The pre-Classic periods
History
The art of music. Vol. 01 (of 14) : $b The pre-Classic periods
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Despite the mixture of styles in the fugue, however, the preponderant
element was still the basket-like texture of winding melodies suitable
especially to voices--hence it was only in the suite, a type which
developed at the same time and of which also Bach was one of the
supreme masters, that the homophonic style suitable to instruments
was freely worked out. Instruments mark the rhythm much more strongly
than voices, so that all sorts of dance movements are particularly
appropriate for them. When the rhythm is so marked, comparatively
short phrases of tune stand out sharply and balance each other like the
verses in a couplet of poetry. Composers soon found out how further to
group these phrases in definite parts or sections, so contrasted that
the whole of the short piece or 'movement’ presented a perfectly clear,
sharp impression, had a definite beginning, middle, and end--a clear
scheme of form. This clearness of impression was enhanced by making
only one line of melody--the 'tune’ or 'air,’ as we say--prominent,
either subordinating all the others or doing away with them entirely
in favor of an accompaniment of detached chords such as we find in a
modern waltz or march. The suite, then, as it is found in its golden
age, the eighteenth century, is a series of short dance tunes of
strongly marked rhythm, precise in phraseology and concise in form,
in the homophonic style. Among its masters may be mentioned, besides
the German Bach, Couperin and Rameau in France, Corelli (violin) and
Scarlatti (harpsichord) in Italy, and Handel in England.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account