The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
History
The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Liszt may be quoted once more, in his rhetorical style, but with his
sympathetic understanding that never misses the mark: ‘Our pianists,’
he says, ‘hardly realize what a noble treasure is to be found in the
clavier music of Schubert. The most of them play him through _en
passant_, notice here and there repetitions and retards--and then lay
them aside. It is true that Schubert himself is partly responsible for
the infrequent performance of his best works. He was too unconsciously
productive, wrote ceaselessly, mingling the trivial and the important,
the excellent and the mediocre, paying no heed to criticism and
giving his wilfullness full swing. He lived in his music as the birds
live in the air and sang as the angels sing--oh, restlessly creative
genius! Oh, faithful hero of my youthful heaven! Harmony, freshness,
power, sympathy, dreaminess, passion, gentleness, tears, and flames
stream from the depths and heights of your soul, and in the magic
of your humanity you almost allow us to forget the greatness of your
mastership!’
Along with Schubert, Weber stands as the progenitor of the modern
pianoforte style. (The comparative claims of the two can never be
evaluated.) Here, again, it was Liszt who chiefly made the importance
of the man known to the world. He took loving pains in the editing
of Weber’s piano works late in his life, and, with conscientious
concern for the composer’s intention, wrote out amplified paraphrases
of many of the passages to make them more effective in performance.
The absolute value of these works, especially the sonatas, is much
disputed. It is customary to call them structurally weak, and at
least reputable to call them indifferent in invention. Yet we are
constantly being reminded in them that their author was a genius,
and the genius who composed _Der Freischütz_. Certainly they deserve
more frequent performance. As sonatas, they are, on the whole, more
brilliant and more adequate than Schubert’s. Single movements, such
as the andante of the A flat sonata, opus 39, can stand beside
Beethoven in emotional dignity and tender beauty. But, whatever is
the absolute musical value of these works, they are an advance on
Beethoven in one particular, the quality which the Germans describe
with the word _klaviermässig_--suited to the piano. For Beethoven,
with all the daring of his later sonatas, got completely away from the
harpsichord method of writing only to write for piano in orchestral
style. He never began to exhaust the qualities of the pianoforte which
are distinctive of the instrument. Weber’s writing is more for the
pianoforte. Especially Weber enriched piano literature with dramatic
pathos and romantic tone coloring, with vigorous harmony and expressive
song-like melody. The famous ‘Invitation to the Dance’ shows him at his
best, giving full play to his love of the simple and folk-like tune,
separating the hands and the fingers, and slashing brilliant streaks
of light and shade in the piano keyboard.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account