The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
History
The art of music, Vol. 02 (of 14) : $b Classicism and Romanticism
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Let us recall for a moment Gluck’s connection with the French _opéra
bouffon_. Favart had complimented him, in a letter to the Vienna opera
director Durazzo, for the excellence of his French ‘déclamation.’
Evidently Gluck and his friend Le Blanc du Roullet, attaché of the
French embassy, had kept track of the _Guerre des bouffons_, and
had taken advantage of the psychology of the moment, for Rameau had
died in 1764 and the consequent weakening of the National party had
resulted in the victory of the Buffonists. Du Roullet suggested to
Gluck and Calzabigi that they collaborate upon a French subject for
an opera, and chose Racine’s _Iphigénie_. The opera was completed and
the text translated by du Roullet, who now wrote a very diplomatic
letter to the authorities of the Académie royale (the Paris opera).
It recounted how the Chevalier Gluck, celebrated throughout Europe,
admired the French style of composition, preferred it, indeed, to the
Italian; how he regarded the French language as eminently suited to
musical treatment, and that he had just finished a new work in French
on a tragedy of the immortal Racine, which exhausted all the powers
of art, simple, natural song, enchanting melody, recitative equal to
the French, dance pieces of the most alluring freshness. Here was
everything to delight a Frenchman’s heart; besides, his opera had been
a great financial success in Bologna, and so valiant a defender of the
French tongue should be given an opportunity in its own home.
The academy saw a new hope in this. It considered the letter in
official session, and cautiously asked to see an act of _Iphigénie_.
After examination of it Gluck was promised an engagement if he would
agree to write six operas like it. This condition, almost impossible of
acceptance for a man of Gluck’s age, was finally removed through the
intercession of Marie Antoinette, now dauphiness of France, Gluck’s
erstwhile pupil in Vienna.
Gluck was invited to come to Paris as the guest of the Académie
and direct the staging of _Iphigénie_. He arrived there with his
wife and niece[14] in the summer of 1773. Lodged in the citadel of
the anti-Buffonists, he incurred in advance the opposition of the
Italian party, but, diplomat that he was, he at once set about to
propitiate the enemy. Rousseau, the intellectual potentate of France,
was eventually won over; but, despite the fact that Gluck’s music
was essentially human and should have fulfilled the demands of the
‘encyclopedists,’ such men as Marmontel, La Harpe, and d’Alambert
were arrayed against him, together with the entire Italian party and
many of the followers of the old French school, who refused to accept
him as the successor of Lully and Rameau. Mme. du Barry was one of
these. Marie Antoinette, on the other hand, constituted herself Gluck’s
protector. It was the _Guerre des bouffons_ at its climax.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account