The art of music, Vol. 04 (of 14) : $b Music in America
History
The art of music, Vol. 04 (of 14) : $b Music in America
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Boston, like most other American cities, has been until recently in
the position of depending chiefly on New York for its operatic fare.
It was the latest of the large Eastern cities to become acquainted
with grand opera, having been introduced to that form of entertainment
by the Havana company of Señor Marty y Torrens in 1847. Satisfied
apparently with what was supplied to it from New York, it initiated no
noteworthy operatic enterprises of its own until 1909, when the Boston
Opera House was built through the munificence of Mr. Eben D. Jordan.
The artistic direction of the new enterprise was placed in the hands of
Mr. Henry Russell, who for some years previously had toured the country
successfully with his San Carlo Opera Company. Since then Boston
has been an operatic city of importance. In addition to excellent
performances of the regular French, Italian, and German repertory made
familiar by the Metropolitan and Manhattan companies, it has heard
the first performances in America of Debussy's _L'Enfant Prodigue_,
Raoul Laparra's _La Habañera_, Frederick Converse's 'The Sacrifice,'
Zan-donai's _Conchita_, Erlanger's _Noël_, Kienzl's _Kuhreigen_,
Bizet's _Djamileh_, Louis Aubert's _Forêt Bleue_, and Henri Fevrier's
_Monna Vanna_.
The Boston Opera Company is very closely affiliated with the
Metropolitan and the principals of each are carried on the roster
of the other. To a lesser extent there is a like exchange between
the Boston and the Chicago-Philadelphia companies. Almong the more
notable artists who have sung with the Boston company (excluding those
belonging principally to the Metropolitan company) may be mentioned
Carmen Mélis, Georgette Le Blanc-Maeterlinck, Leon Sibiriakoff, José
Mardones, Florencio Constantino, Giovanni Zenatello, George Baklanoff,
Lucien Muratore, Vanni Marcoux, and Eduardo Ferrari-Fontana.
It would be impossible, within the limits of a chapter, to follow
operatic activities in other cities of the United States. Nearly every
city of importance has received more or less regular visits from the
big New York companies, from the Chicago-Philadelphia company, and
from lesser enterprises organized for touring purposes. There would be
little point in citing a list of these enterprises, but mention may be
made of the opera companies promoted by Henry W. Savage and the Aborns,
which have done for the smaller cities of the United States what the
Carl Rosa and Moody-Manners companies have done for the principal
cities of Great Britain.
In many of the more progressive musical cities--such as San Francisco,
Los Angeles, Minneapolis, and Cincinnati--the question of permanent
operatic establishments has been strongly mooted, and undoubtedly
the time is fast approaching when these and other cities will enjoy
the advantages which now belong only to New York, Boston, Chicago,
Philadelphia, and New Orleans.
V
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account