The art of music, Vol. 05 (of 14) : $b The voice and vocal music
History
The art of music, Vol. 05 (of 14) : $b The voice and vocal music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
During the Commonwealth secular music flourished, but chiefly on the
Royalist side, since the Puritans, in their idle moments, were largely
engaged in singing hymn tunes. From this period we have the stirring
song ‘When the King Enjoys His Own Again.’ With the return of the
Stuarts and the reign of Charles II the influence of France, where
Charles had spent his years of exile, became dominant. The dance, not
the dance of the people but the stately dance of the court, asserted
its sway over song, and the flesh and blood, which had throbbed so
richly in Elizabethan England, all but dropped out of the later English
product. The songs which are preserved from the period occurred
chiefly in the masques which were performed at court, which were
French to the core. The chief song writer of the time, and of that
just preceding, was Henry Lawes (1595-1662), who wrote the music to
Milton’s immortal masque of ‘Comus.’ Lawes was a true musician, though
not a great one, and he did much for English song in making the music
respect the poetry. He loosened formal bonds and introduced something
of the Italian recitative style. Along with the Restoration we have
semi-folk-songs of a light character, though without the freshness
of preceding decades. We may mention two of the most popular, ‘Come,
Lasses and Lads,’ and ‘Barbara Allen.’ Pelham Humphrey (1647-74), whom
Charles II sent to France to study under Lully, brought back to England
with him the French grace and refinement and helped to set the keynote
for English song for the next half century. This much the returned
Stuart dynasty did for English music, in bringing French traditions
across the Channel, but the more stolid English disposition of the
time never hospitably absorbed the new influence. And in 1688 the
Stuarts were ushered out to the strains of a most remarkable tune,
‘Lilliburlero.’ Of this song it has truly been said that it ‘drove
King James II out of England.’ It was not a patriotic or warlike song,
however, but merely a satire. The ribald words may seem the worst of
doggerel to us now, but their rough satire awakened all England when
the impudence of the Stuarts had become unbearable and the energetic
melody carried them in a flash from one end of the country to the
other. The upheaval of 1688 was the ‘bloodless revolution.’ King James
succumbed to laughter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account