The art of music, Vol. 05 (of 14) : $b The voice and vocal music
History
The art of music, Vol. 05 (of 14) : $b The voice and vocal music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
And, curiously enough, this loose and somewhat commonplace tune
introduces us to the greatest and most sincere of all English musicians
(unless recent years have produced his peer) and to the song writer of
whom, above all others, England has a right to be proud. This man was
Henry Purcell. The tune of ‘Lilliburlero’ was written as an innocent
dance in a book of virginal pieces and thence was brought into the open
air to support the high spirits of the satiric verses. It is quite
certain that Purcell never intended himself to be made immortal when he
wrote it, or to be an instrument in the downfall of King James, to whom
he wrote one of his many ‘odes.’ But into some of his other songs he
put the best he had. They are graceful in the extreme, often decorated
with the vocal turns and embellishments which were the fashion of
the day, but never lacking in the musician’s touch. Their melodic
facility is charming; their appropriateness to the spirit of the words
is convincing; and their delicate architecture makes them, apart from
their vocal quality, polished works of art. Purcell still frequently
(and justly) appears on song programs. Among his many lyrics which are
worth knowing we may mention ‘Full Fathom Five’ and ‘Come Unto These
Yellow Sands,’ to Shakespeare’s words, and ‘I Attempt from Love’s
Sickness to Fly.’
But after Purcell English music showed a falling off in originality
and spontaneous quality which has astonished and mystified historians.
And English song suffered the same fate along with the rest of English
music. Vigorous semi-folk-songs date from the early eighteenth
century--notably ‘Down Among the Dead Men,’ ‘The Vicar of Bray,’
and ‘Pretty Polly Oliver’--but as the century progressed the song
output became more and more vapid and superficial in spirit. This
was doubtless in part due to the vogue of Italian opera which held
fashionable England fascinated and smothered the creative work of
native composers. And as people became disgusted with the fad they
turned to the next best thing at hand, the ‘ballad opera.’ This was
not a very exalted form of art, but it was at least fresher and more
musical than the exaggerated vocal virtuosity of opera, with its
conventionalized arias and its ‘castrati,’ or male sopranos. The
ballad opera came into fashion in 1727, with the enormous success of
‘The Beggar’s Opera,’ a success comparable to that of ‘Pinafore’ a
century and a half later. The ballad opera was strictly not opera at
all, but only a lively and merry farce (often suggesting the operetta
librettos of Sir William Gilbert) interspersed with songs and duets.
These songs were at first but popular melodies of the street or
countryside, adapted to new words, assuring the popularity of the
opera because the tunes were favorites. As the number of native tunes
seemed insufficient to supply the enormous number of ballad operas,
the writers engaged well-known musicians to write original tunes in
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account