The art of music, Vol. 06 (of 14) : $b Choral and church musicCole, Rossetter G. (Rossetter Gleason)
History
The art of music, Vol. 06 (of 14) : $b Choral and church music
Cole, Rossetter G. (Rossetter Gleason)
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Various kinds of organum soon came into vogue. Three-part organum
resulted from doubling the lower of the two parts an octave higher, and
four-part organum from adding to these three parts the original upper
part an octave lower, thus producing simultaneously moving octaves,
fourths, and fifths. Such a progression of parts, quite obnoxious
to ears accustomed to harmony, impressed Hucbald as ‘a delightful
concord.’[6] As the experiments increased, the accompanying voice
(the discant) was added above as well as below the chant (the _cantus
firmus_, or fixed voice). The monotony of exclusive parallelism was
broken by sometimes sustaining the same tone in one part while the
other part moved up or down (oblique motion) or by letting the two
parts move in contrary direction, and lastly, by mixing these three
kinds of tone movement, thus producing greater variety in the intervals
used. When this freer movement of parts was recognized as essential to
more pleasing vocal effects, the word discant came to be applied to it
to distinguish it from the more primitive form of movement--organum--in
parallel fourths, fifths, and octaves. Until the thirteenth century the
intervals most used in all styles of part-writing were fourths, fifths,
octaves, and unisons. Thirds and sixths, though occasionally permitted,
were regarded as dissonances until the period when harmony came to be a
conscious element of musical thought.
[Illustration: The Playing Angels]
_Altar piece by Hubert and Jan van Eyck_
Until a definite system of notation was devised, the discanting parts
to the chants were extemporized by the singers. But when the staff was
invented and notes or points were employed to indicate the exact pitch
of the tones of the melodies, the name counterpoint (_punctus contra
punctum_, note against note) was given to the part or parts added to
the chant (_cantus firmus_). The term counterpoint[7] displaced discant
in the thirteenth century, and from this time the art of counterpoint
developed as the number of added parts increased and the various kinds
of intervallic relationships among the interdependent parts were
recognized and systematized.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account