The art of music, Vol. 06 (of 14) : $b Choral and church music — John Shaqi
The art of music, Vol. 06 (of 14) : $b Choral and church musicCole, Rossetter G. (Rossetter Gleason)
History
The art of music, Vol. 06 (of 14) : $b Choral and church music
Cole, Rossetter G. (Rossetter Gleason)
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Few madrigals whose composition antedate the invention of printing
have been preserved. But all authorities agree that even in its earlier
stages it was composed for three or more voices in the prevailing
church modes. Throughout its best period, which closed practically
with the sixteenth century, it maintained the characteristic of
being sung without instrumental accompaniment of any kind.[12] The
association of concurrent parts with plain-song undoubtedly suggested
similar treatment for secular melodies, and the troubadours and
trouvères were probably the first to put this suggestion into practice.
But they passed out of existence before the art of discant had
progressed beyond its first stage of infancy and further development
of polyphonic secular music was left in the more skilled hands of
the scientifically trained musicians of the church. The madrigal, or
more strictly speaking its predecessors, was forthwith adopted by the
church composers, who treated it with much tenderness and lavished
on it all the learning and technical skill they could command. Since
these composers, however, were so thoroughly imbued by training and
experience with the characteristics and idioms of church music, we find
no essential differences, as far as the music is concerned, between the
madrigal and its ecclesiastical counterpart, the motet (see Chapter
II). These two forms have maintained an almost exact correspondence
with each other in each successive stage of their musical development.
The only real difference lay in the nature of the words employed, those
of the madrigal being always secular, those of the motet, sacred. While
the madrigal was just as polyphonic as the motet and followed the same
general laws of musical construction, it was in lighter vein and in
simpler style to suit the secular spirit of the words. The ponderous
and solemn character of the motet was avoided, the contrapuntal parts
became more plastic and expressive in conformity with the sentiment of
the words. These freer and more expressive qualities in the madrigal
were eagerly seized upon by the dramatic composers of the seventeenth
century, during which period the madrigal was a regular feature of the
opera. Dr. Stainer enumerates the following essential qualities of the
true madrigal: themes suitable in character to the words, variety of
rhythm, short melodic phrases, imitation and counterpoint.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account