The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
History
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Two later sonatas have a more serious _allure_ than these earlier ones.
That in C minor (K. 457), composed in 1784, is commonly considered his
greatest sonata. Why such a distinction should be insisted upon, it is
difficult to see. The C minor sonata is more weighty than the others,
but is it for that reason greater? Must music to be great, hint of the
tragic struggles of the soul? Such is the merit often ascribed to this
sonata, as if there were no true greatness in a smile. Without setting
up a standard of the great and the trivial in music, we may grant that
the work has a compelling force. Let us not liken it to Beethoven. It
still has the charm of which only Mozart was the master, that charm
which remains one of the intangible, inexplicable things in music.
A sonata in F major (K. 533) was composed in 1788. The whole work is
characterized by a possibly too prominent contrapuntal ingenuity. There
is besides a boldness in harmonies, especially in the slow movement,
which makes one wonder into what strange lands Mozart strayed when he
sat improvising at the keyboard.
The sonatas as a whole rest, as we have said, upon a harmonic
foundation which is relatively simple. The great Fantasia in C minor
differs from them in this regard more than in any other. If, as Otto
Jahn suggested in his ‘Life of Mozart,’ this fantasia may offer us some
suggestion of what Mozart’s improvisations were like, we may be sure
that such outpourings wandered into harmonies rich and strange.
The fantasia was composed in 1785, the year after the C minor sonata,
to which it was at one time thought to have been intended as an
introductory movement. An earlier fantasia in D minor is fragmentary.
It ends abruptly and leaves an impression of incompleteness on the mind
of the listener. The C minor fantasia is without definite form, but the
return of the opening motive at the end gives it a logical balance. It
divides itself into five or six sections. The tempo is not very fast in
any one of them, but there is an uneasy current of unrest running under
the whole.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account