The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
History
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
One work may be signalized as marking a keen instinct for pianistic
effects, as really pointing to some such treatment of the keyboard as
Chopin, by reason of his immortal fancy, made unsurpassable, perfect.
This is the concerto in A minor. Here, as we should expect, he
indulged himself in weaving elaborate show-figures over an orchestral
groundwork of little or no musical value. But the show-figures are
often brilliantly effective. For example, after the piano has played
the second theme in the first movement, there follows a long quasi-solo
passage of mixed double and single notes, which, trivial as it may be
as music, gives what one might call a lot of jolly good fun. Notice the
wide spacing here and there, the frequent expeditions into the highest
registers, the marches from bottom to top and the oily trickling back
to middle again. Then in the development section there is good fun
too; and there is a coda which demands the wrist of a virtuoso such as
Chopin or Liszt, instantaneous skips of the arm, runs for both hands in
thirds, all remarkably fluent and all sprung right from the nature if
not the soul of the instrument.
The adagio is, of course, flaccid worthlessness; but the final rondo
has no little musical charm, and, as far as treatment of the pianoforte
goes, is not at all unworthy of Liszt. The triplet rhythm is in itself
brilliantly maintained; there are series of fourths and sixths, triplet
figures very widely spaced, and again single and double notes mixed
in the same group, runs in thirds, chromatic thirds, double trills,
a profusion, in fact, of most of the virtuoso’s stock in trade, all
gracefully and brilliantly displayed.
It will be noticed that the best of it is sheer figure work, without
pianoforte accompaniment, or lightly supported by the orchestra. And
this may point to one of the marks of its mediocrity as a whole, one of
the reasons why it sounds, after all, laughably old-fashioned in many
measures. This is no other than the lack of variety, of skill, and of
taste in accompaniment figures. In one of the unquestionably effective
passages already referred to--the first solo passages for the piano
in the first movement, after the second theme--the right-hand work
is modern; but the left hand has only the vapid, commonplace tum-tum
scheme of single note and chord. Not only is this formula repeated
flatly, without attempt at variety, in blissful ignorance of its
unworthiness; even the very notes are repeated as far as it is possible
to go without changing the harmony.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account