The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
History
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
All these sets of pieces were written in good faith for the harpsichord
as well as for the organ. But in reality, except in so far as certain
principles of form are valuable to all music, and a few figures of
musical ornamentation are common to all keyboard music, harpsichord
music profits but vicariously from Frescobaldi. His music is
essentially organ music, and the development it marks as accomplished,
and that toward which it points, are proper to the organ and not to
the harpsichord. To the one instrument breadth and power are fitting,
to the other lightness and fleetness. Inasmuch as the same distinction
exists between the organ and the pianoforte at the present day, with
some allowances made for improvements in the mechanism of the organ and
for the great sonority of the pianoforte, which allowances affect only
the degree but not the kind of differences, Frescobaldi can be said to
have influenced the development of pianoforte music only by what he
contributed toward the solution of very general problems of form and
structure.
The same must be said of many other great organists of his and of later
days, such as Zweelinck, Samuel Scheidt, Buxtehude, Bohm, Pachelbel,
and others. It may be noted that after the death of Frescobaldi the art
of organ-playing passed from Italy, the land of its birth and first
considerable growth, to Germany. Here a great line of virtuosi added
more and more to the splendor and dignity of organ music, perfecting
and embellishing style, inventing new forms and making them firm. They
remained loyal to the polyphonic style, partly because this is almost
essentially proper to the organ with its unlimited power to sustain
tone; partly because it is the impressive and noble style of music most
in keeping with the spirit of the church, from which the organ will
apparently never be wholly dissociated.[3]
It cannot be said that this style is in any measure so fitting to the
harpsichord and the clavichord or to the pianoforte. For these, a
markedly different sort of polyphony has been devised. But so long as
organists alone walked in music with the power of assurance--and they
were well in command of the problems of their special art while other
instrumentalists and writers of operas were floundering about--so long
did their influence keep instrumental music in sway.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account