The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music — John Shaqi
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
History
The art of music, Vol. 07 (of 14) : $b Pianoforte and chamber music
Music -- History and criticism; Musicians
Consistently to hold to one thematic subject throughout a piece in
polyphonic style, skillfully to contrast or weave with that secondary
subjects, mark another stage of development passed. The fugue is the
result, now articulate, though awaiting its final glory from the hand
of J. S. Bach. To write little dance pieces in neat and precise form
is an art likewise well mastered; and to combine several of these,
written in the same key, in an order which, by affording contrast of
rhythms, can stir the listener’s interest and hold his attention, is
the established rule for the first of the so-called cyclic forms,
prototype of the symphony and sonata of later days. Such were the great
accomplishments of the musicians of the seventeenth century in the
matter of form.
V
In the matter of style, likewise, much was accomplished. We have had
occasion frequently to point out that in the main the harpsichord
remained throughout the first half of the seventeenth century under
the influence of the organ. For this instrument a conjunct or _legato_
style has proved to be most fitting. Sudden wide stretches, capricious
leaps, and detached runs seldom find a place in the texture of great
organ music. The organist strives for a smoothness of style compatible
with the dignity of the instrument, and this smoothness may be taken as
corollary to the fundamental relationship between organ music and the
vocal polyphony of the sixteenth century.
On the other hand, by comparison with the vocal style, the organ style
is free. Where the composer of masses was restricted by the limited
ability of the human voice to sing wide intervals accurately, the
organist was limited only by the span of the hand. Where Palestrina
could count only upon the ear of his singers to assure accurate
intonation, the organist wrote for a keyboard which, supposing the
organ to be in tune, was a mechanism that of itself could not go
wrong. Given, as it were, a physical guarantee of accuracy as a basis
for experiment, the organist was free to devise effects of sheer
speed or velocity of which voices would be utterly incapable. He had
a huge gamut of sounds equally at his command, a power that could be
mechanically bridled or let loose. His instrument could not be fatigued
while boys could be hired to pump the bellows. So long as his finger
held down a key, or his foot a pedal, so long would the answering note
resound, diminishing, increasing, increasing, diminishing, according to
his desire, never exhausted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account