Matterhorn (Switzerland and Italy); Mountaineering
246 Marked with a cross on the map.
247 A pair of gloves, a belt, and boot that had belonged to him, were
found. This, somehow, became publicly known, and gave rise to wild
notions, which would not have been entertained had it been also
known that the _whole_ of the boots of those who had fallen _were
off_, and were lying upon the snow near the bodies.
248 The three ropes have been reduced by photography to the same scale.
249 I was one hundred feet or more from the others whilst they were
being tied up, and am unable to throw any light on the matter. Croz
and old Peter no doubt tied up the others.
250 This is not the only occasion upon which M. Clemenz (who presided
over the inquiry) has failed to give up answers that he has
promised. It is greatly to be regretted that he does not feel that
the suppression of the truth is equally against the interests of
travellers and of the guides. If the men are untrustworthy, the
public should be warned of the fact; but if they are blameless, why
allow them to remain under unmerited suspicion?
Old Peter Taugwalder is a man who is labouring under an unjust
accusation. Notwithstanding repeated denials, even his comrades and
neighbours at Zermatt persist in asserting or insinuating that he
_cut_ the rope which led from him to Lord F. Douglas. In regard to
this infamous charge, I say that he _could_ not do so at the moment
of the slip, and that the end of the rope in my possession shows
that he did not do so beforehand. There remains, however, the
suspicious fact that the rope which broke was the thinnest and
weakest one that we had. It is suspicious, because it is unlikely
that any of the four men in front would have selected an old and
weak rope when there was abundance of new, and much stronger, rope
to spare; and, on the other hand, because if Taugwalder thought that
an accident was likely to happen, it was to his interest to have the
weaker rope where it was placed.
I should rejoice to learn that his answers to the questions which
were put to him were satisfactory. Not only was his act at the
critical moment wonderful as a feat of strength, but it was
admirable in its performance at the right time. I am told that he is
now nearly incapable for work—not absolutely mad, but with intellect
gone and almost crazy; which is not to be wondered at, whether we
regard him as a man who contemplated a scoundrelly meanness, or as
an injured man suffering under an unjust accusation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account