The astounding crime on Torrington Road : $b Being an account of what might be termed "the Pentecost episode" in a most audacious criminal career — John Shaqi
The astounding crime on Torrington Road : $b Being an account of what might be termed "the Pentecost episode" in a most audacious criminal careerGillette, William
General
The astounding crime on Torrington Road : $b Being an account of what might be termed "the Pentecost episode" in a most audacious criminal career
Gillette, William
Detective and mystery stories; Murder -- Investigation -- Fiction
He finally told them that his name was Walter McArdle, that he’d lately
come over from England, and that his occupation was acting for the
movies. He had no family and the only people he knew were the Essanay
managers who engaged him, and a few of the actors in the company—and
those not very well. Morrison was an artist and pushed it along the
line of one of his pet rôles. Everything tended to show that the man
was Walter McArdle. He later described without effort or hesitation
his lodgings on Rand Street and everything in them (I don’t need to
say that Spellman had been there first), where to find his accounts,
letters from home, how many shirts he had, and so forth and so on.
He told them, in answer to questions, all about the picture he’d been
working in; you see Spellman had got everything possible out of McArdle
before he left. But his crook artistry led to his instructing Morrison
to make a slip or two in places where a person with an ordinary memory
might not have been quite sure. Remembering too much is often more
dangerous than remembering too little.
McArdle, except in rare instances, was seen at the studio in North
Chicago only with his make-up on, and in these rare instances it would
be only for brief moments as he passed in or out of the building on his
way to and from his dressing room. As a consequence those associated
with him in the picture—directors, photographers, electricians,
property men, and his fellow actors in the cast—were misled by
Morrison’s close resemblance, and testified to his being McArdle, and
that he was at the studio occupied with his work in the picture on the
afternoon the robbery and assault was committed. His entire familiarity
with the piece they’d been filming and incidents that happened during
its progress—some, indeed, on the very afternoon of the arrest—had
great weight in the Essanay offices.
There were three persons whose evidence cost money, owing to the fact
that they knew McArdle too well for Morrison to get by: the manager
of the cheap restaurant where the movie actor got his meals; the girl
waitress at the same place; and the actor who dressed in the same
room with him at the Essanay studios. Particularly the last. He was
a bit “fly” and saw that he had them. Also he wanted his in advance.
This mass of evidence, with much more—such as that of the janitor of
the building where McArdle roomed and many minor things that had been
attended to—accomplished its purpose. No doubt existed that the police
had arrested the wrong man. The police themselves were convinced of it.
And the necessary formalities for his release having been gone through,
Bill Morrison made his getaway.
Not many days later Max Spellman did the same.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account