The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentationHolst, Helge
Science
The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentation
Holst, Helge
Atomic theory
The fundamental phenomena of electricity, which were first made the
subject of careful study about two centuries ago, are that certain
substances can be electrified by friction so that somehow they can
attract light bodies, and that the charges of electricity may be
either “positive” or “negative.” Bodies with like charges repel each
other, while those with unlike charges attract each other, and either
partially or entirely neutralize each other when they are brought
close together. Moreover, it had long ago been discovered that in some
substances electricity can move freely from place to place, while in
others there is resistance to the movement. The former bodies are now
called _conductors_ and include metals, while the latter are
called _insulators_, glass, porcelain and air being members of
this class.
In order to explain the phenomena some imagined that there were two
kinds of “electric substances” or “fluids”; and since no change in
weight could be discovered in a body when it was electrified, it was,
in general, assumed that the electric fluids were weightless. In the
normal, neutral body it was believed that these fluids were mixed in
equal quantities, thereby neutralizing each other; on this account they
were supposed to be of opposite characteristics, so one was called
positive and the other negative. According to a second theory, there
was assumed to be just one kind of electricity, which was present in a
normal amount in neutral bodies; positive electricity was caused by a
superfluity of the fluid; negative, by a deficit. In both theories it
was possible to talk of the amount of positive or negative electricity
which a body contained or with which it was “charged,” because the
supporters of the one-fluid idea understood by the terms positive and
negative a superfluity and a deficit, respectively, of the one fluid.
In both theories it was possible to talk about the _direction_
of the electric current in a conductor, since the supporters of the
two-fluid theory understood by “direction” that in which the electric
forces sent the positive electricity, or the opposite to that in which
the negative would be sent. It could not be decided whether positive
electricity went in the one direction or the negative in the other,
or whether each simultaneously moved in its own direction. Both
theories were quite arbitrary in designating the electric charge in
glass, which was rubbed with woollen cloth, as positive. On the whole,
neither theory seemed to have any essential advantage over the other;
the difference between them seemed to lie more in phraseology than in
actual fact.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account