The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentationHolst, Helge
Science
The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentation
Holst, Helge
Atomic theory
The second question is whether one cannot liberate and utilize the
energy latent in the interior of the atom. This question, which was
suggested in the first instance by the discovery of radium, has
recently attracted considerable attention because of reports that,
according to Einstein’s relativity theory, one gram of any substance
by virtue of its mass alone must contain a quantity of energy equal
to that produced by the burning of 3000 tons of coal. The meaning of
this statement is this: it has already been mentioned that according
to the relativity theory a decrease in the energy of a body brings
about a decrease in its mass; it is immaterial in what form the energy
is given up, whether as heat, elastic oscillations, or the like; all
that is said is, that to a certain decrease in mass, will correspond
a perfectly definite emission of energy in some form. If we now could
imagine the whole mass of one gram of a substance to be “destroyed”
(_i.e._ caused to disappear utterly as a physical substance),
and to reappear as heat energy, for example, then we could compute
from the known relation between mass and energy, that the heat energy
thus brought about would be equivalent to that obtained by the burning
of 3000 tons of coal. But in order that all this energy should be
developed, even the hydrogen nuclei and the electrons would have to be
“destroyed,” and no phenomenon is known, supporting the supposition
that such a “destruction” of the fundamental particles of a substance
is possible, or that it is possible to transform these particles into
other types of energy. A thought like this must rather be stamped as
fantasy, the origin of which is to be found in a misunderstanding of a
purely scientific mode of expression.
The case is essentially different with those quantities of energy which
must be assumed to be freed or absorbed in the transformation of one
nuclear system into another, that is, in elemental transformations.
Though these are far smaller in amount, the radioactive processes
indicate that they are not wholly to be despised. For one gram of
radium will upon complete disintegration to non-radioactive material
give off as much energy as is equivalent to 460 kg. of coal. But even
here we must confess that it will take about 1700 years for only half
of the radium to be transformed. It is not at all impossible that
other elemental transformations might lead to just as great energy
developments as appear in the disintegration of radioactive substances.
Let us imagine that four hydrogen nuclei, which together have a mass
of 4 × 1·008 = 4·032, and two electrons could join together to form
a helium nucleus with atomic weight very close to 4. This process
would thus result in a loss of mass which must be assumed to appear in
another form of energy. The amount of energy obtainable in this way
from one gram of hydrogen would be considerably more than that given
off by the disintegration of one gram of radium.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account