The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentationHolst, Helge
Science
The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentation
Holst, Helge
Atomic theory
There can hardly exist any doubt that in nature there occur not only
disintegrations, but also (perhaps in the interior of the stars)
building-up processes in which compound nuclei result from simple
ones. It is therefore natural to suppose that by exerting on hydrogen
exceptional conditions of temperature, pressure, electrical changes,
etc., we could succeed by experiments here on earth in forming helium
from it with the development of considerable energy. But at the same
time it is very likely that even under favourable circumstances
such a process would take place with very great slowness, because
the formation of a helium nucleus might well be a very infrequent
occurrence; it would probably be the result of a certain succession
of collisions between hydrogen nuclei and electrons, a combination
whose probability of occurrence in a certain number of collisions is
infinitely less than the probability of winning the largest prize in a
lottery with the same number of chances. Nature has time enough to wait
for “wins,” while mankind unfortunately has not. We know concerning
the disintegration of the radioactive substances that it is of the
character here indicated; of the great number of atoms to be found
in a very small mass of a radioactive substance, now one explodes
and now another. But why fortune should pick out one particular atom
is as difficult to understand as why in a lottery one particular
number should prove to be the lucky one rather than any other. Our
only understanding of the whole matter rests on the law of averages,
or probability as we may call it. We know that of a billion radium
atoms (10¹²) on the average thirteen explode every second; and even
if in any single collection of a billion a few more or a few less may
explode, the average of thirteen per second per billion will always
be maintained in dealing with larger and larger numbers of atoms, as,
for example, with a thousand billion or a million billion. For other
radioactive substances we get wholly different averages for the number
of atoms disintegrating per second; but in no case are we able to
penetrate into the inner character of the process of disintegration
itself. And what holds true of the radioactive substances will also
hold true probably for elemental changes of all kinds; Rutherford with
his hundreds of thousands of α-particle projectiles was able to make
sure of but a few lucky “shots.” The whole matter must at this stage be
looked upon as governed wholly by chance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account