The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentationHolst, Helge
Science
The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentation
Holst, Helge
Atomic theory
Robert Boyle (1627-1691) is one of the men to whom great honour is
due for brushing aside the old ideas about the elements which had
originated in obscure philosophical meditations. To him an element was
simply a substance which by no method could be separated into other
substances, but which could unite with other elements to form chemical
compounds possessing very different characteristics, including that
of being decomposable into their constituent elements. Undoubtedly
Boyle’s clear conception of this matter was connected with his
representation of matter as of an atomic nature. According to the
atomic conception, the chemical processes do not depend upon changes
within the element itself, but rather in the union or disunion of the
constituent atoms. Thus when iron sulphide is produced by heating iron
and sulphur together, according to this conception, the iron atoms
and the sulphur atoms combine in such a way that each iron atom links
itself with a sulphur atom. There is then a definite meaning in the
statement that iron sulphide consists of iron and sulphur, and that
these two substances are both represented in the new substance. There
is also a definite meaning, for instance, in the statement that iron
is an element, namely, that by no known means can the iron be broken
down into different kinds of atoms which can be reunited to produce a
substance different from iron.
The clarity which the atomic interpretation gave to the conception of
chemical elements and compounds was surely most useful to chemical
research in the following years; but before the atomic theory could
play a really great rôle in chemistry, it had to undergo considerable
development. In the time of Boyle, and even later, there was still
uncertainty as to which substances were the elements. Thus, water
was generally considered as an element. According to the so-called
phlogiston theory developed by the German Stahl (1660-1734), a theory
which prevailed in chemistry for many years, the metals were chemical
compounds consisting of a gaseous substance, phlogiston, which was
driven off when the metals were heated in air, and the metallic
oxide which was left behind. It was not until the latter half of the
eighteenth century that the foundation was laid for the new chemical
science by a series of discoveries and researches carried on by the
Swedish scientist Scheele, the Englishmen Priestley and Cavendish,
and particularly by the Frenchman Lavoisier. It was then discovered
that water is a chemical compound of the gaseous elements oxygen
and hydrogen, that air is principally a mixture (not a compound) of
oxygen and nitrogen, that combustion is a chemical process in which
some substance is united with oxygen, that metals are elements, while
metallic oxides, on the other hand, are compounds of metal and oxygen,
etc. Of special significance for the atomic theory was the fact that
Lavoisier made weighing one of the most powerful tools of scientific
chemistry.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account