The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentationHolst, Helge
Science
The atom and the Bohr theory of its structure : $b an elementary presentation
Holst, Helge
Atomic theory
where _n″_ and _n′_ can assume integral values. This was
done since it was not to be believed that the spectral properties of
chemically different elements could be so similar. This view was very
much strengthened when Fowler, in 1912, discovered the Pickering lines
in the light from a vacuum tube containing a mixture of hydrogen and
helium. It could not quite be understood, however, why the new lines
did not in general appear in the hydrogen spectrum.
According to the Bohr theory for the hydrogen spectrum it was
impossible—except by giving up the agreement (cf. p. 129) with
electrodynamics in the region of high orbit numbers—to attribute to the
hydrogen atom the emission of lines corresponding to a formula where
the whole numbers were halved. The formula given above might, however,
also be written as
( 1 1 )
ν = 4K(------ - ------).
( _n″_² _n′_² )
If the earlier calculations had been carried out a little more
generally, _i.e._, if instead of equating the nuclear charge with
1 elementary electric quantum _e_, as in hydrogen, it had been
equated with N_e_ where N is an integer, then the frequency might
have been written as
( 1 1 )
ν = N²K(------ - ------).
( _n″_² _n′_² )
This formula is evidently the same as that just given when N equals
2. Now we know that helium has the atomic number and nuclear charge 2
(cf. p. 90); a normal neutral helium atom has two electrons and it is,
therefore, very different from a hydrogen atom. If, however, a helium
atom has lost one electron and therefore has become a positive ion
with one charge, it is a system like the hydrogen atom with only one
single electron moving about the nucleus. It differs in its “outer”
characteristics from the hydrogen atom only in having a nuclear charge
twice as great, _i.e._ its spectral formula must be given with
N = 2, or N² = 4. The formula for the supposed hydrogen lines would
consequently fit the case of a helium atom which has lost an electron.
Bohr was aware of this, and he therefore suggested that the lines in
question were due, not to hydrogen, but to helium.
At first all the authorities in the field of spectroscopy were against
this view; but most of the doubt was dispelled when Evans showed that
the lines could be produced in a vacuum tube where there was only
helium with not a trace of hydrogen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account