The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The oldest stage-buildings, which Dörpfeld dates soon after the middle
of the fourth century and Puchstein at the end of the fifth, are marked
by cross-shading in the plan, and denoted by the letter _n_. They
consisted, as will be seen, of a long and narrow rectangular structure.
In the front, towards each end, were two projecting side-wings. The
length of the building was 152 feet, and its depth, measured between the
wings, 21 feet. The wings themselves were 25 feet wide, and projected
about 17 feet on the inside. The roof of the building was originally
supported by a line of columns running along the centre, of which some
traces still remain. At the back of the building there was a low narrow
wall, running immediately in front of the supporting wall, and fitted
with square holes at regular intervals. The purpose of the wall is very
obscure; but Dörpfeld conjectures that the upper story was of wood, and
not of stone, and that it rested on wooden beams which were placed in
these holes. Puchstein, on the other hand, believes that there was an
upper story of stone. The evidence is not sufficiently clear to render
a decision possible.[385] As regards the appearance of the building in
the front nothing can be ascertained with certainty. The space between
the side-wings evidently contained the stage, but no traces of it are
to be found. It must therefore have been a temporary erection of wood.
Dörpfeld supposes that the front of the two side-wings, and the front
of the wall between them, were decorated with columns and entablatures
about thirteen feet high.[386] But the evidence for this opinion is far
from conclusive. It is founded on the fact that the stylobates used in
the later side-wings were not originally designed for that position,
but had obviously been used somewhere else before. Dörpfeld supposes,
perhaps correctly, that they stood at first in front of the Lycurgean
side-wings.[387] But this is no justification for assuming that the wall
between the wings in the Lycurgean building was also decorated in the
same way. The stylobate used for this part of the later building was
a new one, and not an old one rearranged; and this fact seems to show
that there was no such stylobate in the building of Lycurgus. Otherwise
there would have been just as much reason for using it, as for using
the two stylobates from the wings. On the whole then it is clear that
we know very little about the old stage-building of the fourth or late
fifth century beyond the shape of its ground-plan. As to its height, the
material used in its upper stories, and the manner in which its front was
embellished, there is no certain evidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account