The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
It will be seen from the illustration that in the theatre of Aspendos
there were five doors at the back of the stage. There was a large door
in the centre, and two smaller ones on each side. The same arrangement
was generally adopted in Graeco-Roman theatres. But Pollux and Vitruvius
speak of three doors as the regulation number.[447] Possibly, therefore,
the five doors of the later theatres were not all used during the
dramatic representations. When the stage was prepared for the performance
of a play, the two doors on the outside may have been covered up with
scenery; or temporary side-wings may have been erected in front of them.
Another noticeable feature in the theatre of Aspendos is the roof over
the stage. Traces of a similar roof are also found at Orange, and justify
the conclusion that in most theatres of the Roman type the stage was
covered over.[448] Whether the same practice prevailed in the Hellenistic
theatres there is no evidence to show. But the convenience of the
arrangement is so obvious, that we can hardly doubt that it began to be
employed at a comparatively early period.
In a large number of cases the process of Romanizing the Greek theatres
was not carried out completely. Many theatres, whether built or
reconstructed on the new model, still retained features which were
essentially Greek. This was the case at Athens. The Greek stage was
usually the same length as one diameter of the orchestra. The Roman stage
was twice as long, and extended some distance into the wings of the
auditorium on each side. There was no open space between the auditorium
and the side-wings; the place of the old Greek ‘parodoi’ was supplied
by vaulted subways. But at Athens, when the Neronian alterations were
made, the stage was not prolonged in the Roman style, but remained of the
same length as before. The entrances into the orchestra at _a_ and _g_
were thus left open (Fig. 3). In many other places, especially in Asia
Minor, the Romanization was of a still more partial kind. In theatres
such as those of Termessos, Perge, and Sagalassos the general outline
of the building was hardly affected by the change. The front line of
the stage was not pushed forward; the orchestra still remained nearly a
complete circle; open passages were left between the auditorium and the
stage-buildings. The only important alteration was in the size of the
stage, which was lengthened at each end, and deepened by throwing the
front of the stage-buildings farther back. The height of the stage was
but slightly diminished. In a Roman theatre it was usually five feet.
But the stages at Termessos, Sagalassos, and Patara vary from eight feet
to nine, and were therefore very little lower than the ordinary stage of
the Vitruvian type.[449]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account