The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
For the fifth century we have the evidence supplied by the use of certain
words in Aristophanes. In three places, where an actor is approaching
the back-scene, he is said to ‘mount up’ (ἀναβαίνειν).[517] In two
other places, where he is leaving the back-scene, he is said to ‘go
down’ (καταβαίνειν).[518] In all these passages there is nothing in the
circumstances of the drama to suggest that the action was taking place
on raised ground. The expressions can only refer, as the scholiast says,
to the stage. It has been proposed to translate the two words as ‘come
on’ and ‘depart’ respectively.[519] But such a usage of the terms is
otherwise unknown in Greek. Moreover, in one place—the scene in the
Knights—this translation is proved to be impossible. Here Demosthenes
calls out to the sausage-seller, ‘mount up here’ (ἀνάβαινε δεῦρο). He
then shows him the people, the markets, and the harbours; and tells
him that he will be lord of all. But this is not enough. He says, ‘you
have not seen all yet’, and bids him ‘mount up on to this table also’;
and then proceeds to show him the islands round about.[520] These words
show conclusively that ἀναβαίνειν must mean ‘mount up’ in the previous
passage, and likewise determine the meaning of this word, and of
καταβαίνειν, in the parallel passages.
The extant dramas have been carefully ransacked during the last few
years,[521] and it is not likely that many new points will now be
discovered. Much of the evidence that has been brought forward on
both sides of the question is really of little value. It depends upon
a too scrupulous and literal interpretation of the text, or upon a
forgetfulness of the fact that there is much that is conventional in all
dramatic performances. For instance, when old men are approaching the
palace, and complain of the steepness of the way, this fact is supposed
to be a proof of the existence of a stage.[522] It is suggested that
they enter by the orchestra, and that the ascent of which they complain
is the ascent on to the stage. But, if this was so, these old men must
have timed their entrance very exactly, so as to reach the foot of the
stage just when they came to the verses in which they began to grumble
about the ascent. And this, combined with the obvious inadequacy of the
ascent on to the stage to represent a really fatiguing road, would make
the whole proceeding rather ludicrous. It seems more natural to assume
that their remarks had no reference to the stage, and that the steepness
of which they complain was left to the imagination of the spectators.
Then again, the appearances of ghosts and spectres are cited as evidence
in favour of a stage. It is said that they could not be made to appear
from underground, unless there was a raised platform out of which they
ascended. Now there is no doubt that in the later theatre ghosts were
made to arise from beneath the earth. Pollux gives a description of the
mechanism by which it was done. But there is no certain proof that they
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account