The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The progress of landscape-painting in general among the later Greeks
naturally produced its effect upon the work of the scenic artists. But it
would be an anachronism to attribute efforts of this ambitious kind to
the contemporaries of Sophocles and Euripides.
The introduction of magnificent decorations appears to be always a
later development in the history of the drama. On the Elizabethan stage
the back-scene consisted of a bare wall, and anything in the way of
spectacular effect was provided by the movements and groupings of the
actors. To produce an impression by scenic means would have been alien
to the taste of the Athenians of the fifth century. In the dramatic
performances of that period the conspicuous feature was the chorus in
the foreground, with its graceful arrangement and picturesque dresses.
Above the chorus, on the narrow stage, stood the actors and mute figures,
arranged in line, and dressed in brilliant colours. The long scene in
the rear was so far decorated as to form a pleasing background, and show
off the persons of the actors to advantage. But no attempt was made
to produce a realistic landscape, or to convey the ideas of depth and
distance. In its general effect the scene upon the stage resembled a long
frieze or bas-relief, with the figures painted in brilliant colours,
rather than a picture with a distant perspective.
§ 2. _Mechanical Arrangements for the Scenery._
The scenery consisted of painted curtains or boards, attached to the wall
at the back of the stage.[583] As the mechanical arrangements for fixing
them up have not been described by any of the ancient writers, a detailed
account of the matter is impossible. But some facts can be deduced from
the testimony of the existing dramas. In every Greek play the action
was supposed to take place in the open air. The scene was generally
laid before some building or tent, or in a country district with a rock
or cavern in the background. The upper portion of the painted scene
represented merely the sky, and was probably the same in all dramas. The
lower portion delineated the building or landscape which the particular
play required. It used to be commonly supposed that this lower portion
projected two or three feet in front of the upper; that the back-scene
was not a flat surface from top to bottom, but that a narrow ledge or
platform ran across from wing to wing about half-way up.[584] The object
of this hypothesis was to provide room for the ‘distegia’. The distegia
was a contrivance which enabled actors to take their stand upon the roof
of a palace or private house.[585] Eight or nine instances of its use are
to be found in the existing Greek plays. Thus the Agamemnon of Aeschylus
opens with the watchman sitting upon the roof of the palace at Argos, and
waiting for the beacon’s signal. In the Phoenissae of Euripides Antigone
and the attendant mount upon the roof to get a view of the army encamped
outside the city. In the concluding scene of the Orestes Hermione,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account