The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The only appliances for changing scenery that are mentioned by the
ancient Greek writers are the ‘periaktoi’.[607] These were huge
triangular prisms, revolving on a socket at the base. Each of the three
sides of the prism consisted of a large flat surface, shaped like an
upright parallelogram. One of these prisms was placed at each end of
the stage, in such a manner as to fit in exactly with the scene at the
back, and continue it in the direction of the side-wings. Each of the
three sides was painted to represent a different view, but care was
taken that in every case the painting should coincide exactly with the
painting in the back-scene.[608] As the periaktos was turned round, it
presented a different surface to the spectators. Accordingly it was
possible, by revolving both the periaktoi, to make a change in the
character of the scenery at each end of the stage, while the scene in the
background remained the same as before. The periaktos to the right of
the audience depicted views in the immediate neighbourhood of the city
where the action was taking place. The periaktos to the left represented
a more remote country. This fact corresponds exactly with the regulation
already referred to, that the entrances to the right of the audience were
reserved for people from the immediate neighbourhood, while people from a
distance came in by the left.
The principal use of the periaktoi must have been to produce a change of
scene in cases where the prominent feature of the background remained
the same. For instance, if the action had been taking place in front of
a temple or palace, and was to be transferred to a temple or palace in a
different country, the requisite alteration might easily be carried out
by means of the periaktoi. The building in the background would remain
the same, but the scenery on each side would be altered. Occasions for
using the periaktoi might sometimes occur during the course of a single
play. But such cases, as we have seen, were extremely rare. It must have
been chiefly in the intervals between successive plays that the periaktoi
were employed. Most Greek tragedies and comedies took place before a
temple, a palace, or a private house. If therefore a series of plays was
being exhibited, it might be convenient to retain the same scene in the
background, and produce the necessary distinction between the different
plays by altering the scenery at each side. The usage of the periaktoi
was regulated by a curious conventional custom. If only one periaktos was
turned round, the alteration in the scenery was, of course, confined to
one end of the stage. This was done when the change of scene was supposed
to be a slight one, and was merely from one part of the same district to
another. But when the action was transferred to an entirely new district,
then both the periaktoi were turned round, and the scenery was changed
at each end. The representation of scenery on the periaktoi was probably
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account