The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The origin of this tragic costume is a subject about which very little
is known. According to the later Greek tradition it was invented almost
entirely by Aeschylus.[716] But this is probably an exaggeration.
Aeschylus was no doubt mainly instrumental in developing and improving
the costume, and giving it a definite shape. But that the whole idea of
it was his own creation is hardly credible. Most likely it had existed,
though in a less elaborate form, long before his time. As for its origin,
the most plausible view seems to be that it was derived from the old
traditional garb of the Bacchic cultus, worn by Dionysus himself and by
his chief attendants.[717] Several indications point in this direction.
In early works of art Dionysus and his followers often appear in a long
flowing robe, not unlike that of the tragic stage. They also wear a tall
hunting boot, which was sometimes called the cothurnus, and which may
have been the prototype from which the tragic cothurnus was developed.
The custom of disguising the features with a mask or some similar device
was always a regular institution in the mummeries connected with the
Bacchic worship. The old comic actors, before the invention of the
theatrical mask, used to smear their faces with wine, or cover them with
fig-leaves. Masks were regularly worn in the processions of Dionysus down
to the latest times. The Latin peasantry, at their Bacchic festivals,
used to cover their faces with masks made out of the bark of trees.[718]
All these facts are in favour of the conclusion that the tragic dress,
with its mask, its cothurnus, and its flowing robe, was not so much the
invention of the fifth century as a development from the old festal
costume.[719] This theory has also the advantage of ascribing a parallel
origin to the dresses of the chorus and those of the actors. While the
chorus, in the older drama, appeared in the guise of satyrs or rustic
votaries of Dionysus, the actors, whose part was more dignified, assumed
the garb of Dionysus himself and of his chief attendants. One ancient
tradition asserts that the tragic dress was copied in later times by
the hierophants and torch-bearers at the Eleusinian mysteries.[720]
Some scholars have twisted this tradition round, and suggested that it
was from the hierophants and torch-bearers that the first notion of the
tragic dress was borrowed. But neither view can be regarded as probable.
That the two costumes were not dissimilar seems to be proved by the
existence of the tradition referred to. But it is unlikely that the garb
used at the performances in honour of one deity should have been borrowed
from the cultus of another. The resemblance may be better explained by
the supposition that both costumes were ancient religious dresses, used
in the worship of Dionysus and Demeter respectively.
[Illustration: FIG. 15.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account