The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at AthensHaigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
History
The Attic theatre : $b a description of the stage and theatre of the Athenians, and of the dramatic performances at Athens
Haigh, A. E. (Arthur Elam)
Athens (Greece) -- Intellectual life; Greek drama -- History and criticism; Theater -- Greece -- Athens -- History -- To 500
The use of appropriate gesture, in the case of Greek acting, was
especially important, since facial expression was prevented by the
mask, and the actor had to depend solely on the tones of his voice, and
the effectiveness of his movements. In comedy, as might be expected,
the gesticulation was of a free and unconstrained character, and is
exemplified in numerous works of art. In tragedy, on the other hand, a
more dignified style was adopted. The nature of the tragic actor’s dress
was sufficient in itself to make a realistic type of acting impossible.
Of course it is easy to exaggerate the cumbersomeness of the ancient
costume. It would be a mistake to suppose that it hampered the actor’s
limbs to such an extent as to prevent him moving about like an ordinary
human being. Many passages in the ancient dramas prove that this was not
the case. Actors could walk rapidly off the stage, or fly for refuge to
an altar, or kneel down in supplication, without any difficulty.[819]
They could even fall flat on the ground. Philoctetes sinks to the earth
in a fainting-fit, overcome by the pain of his wound. Iolaus is knocked
down by the Argive herald, while trying to protect the children of
Hercules. Ajax throws himself on his sword, and Evadne flings herself
from a rock on to the funeral pyre beneath. Hecuba, at the beginning
of the Troades, lies stretched upon the earth in an agony of grief;
and later on, when she hears the doom of Cassandra, she again falls
prostrate.[820] But although, as we see from these examples, the tragic
actor was not debarred from the ordinary use of his limbs, still the
character of his dress must have made violent and impetuous movements a
matter of great difficulty. Even if they had been easy, they would have
been inconsistent with the tone of the tragic stage. The world of Greek
tragedy was an ideal world of heroes and demigods, whose nature was
grander and nobler than that of human beings. The realistic portrayal
of ordinary human passions was foreign to the purpose of Greek tragedy.
Scenes of physical violence or of abject prostration, such as those
which have just been mentioned, are of rare occurrence. To be in harmony
with this elevation of tone it was necessary that the acting should be
dignified and self-restrained. Violent movements were usually avoided.
A certain statuesque simplicity and gracefulness of pose accompanied
the gestures of the tragic actor. On the long and narrow stage the
figures were arranged in picturesque and striking groups, and the
successive scenes in the play presented to the eye of the spectator a
series of artistic tableaux. The representations of tragic scenes and
personages in ancient works of art are characterized by a dignity and
a repose which call to mind the creations of the sculptor. This sober
and restrained style of acting was developed under the influence of
Aeschylus and Sophocles during the great period of Attic tragedy. In
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account